Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts

Sunday, 13 April 2025

The Myth Behind The Art of the Deal: How Trump’s Ghostwriter Came to Regret It All


 

The Myth Behind The Art of the Deal: How Trump’s Ghostwriter Came to Regret It All

Why the man who made Donald Trump look like a genius now calls the book a “work of fiction” — and a dangerous one at that.

In 1987, The Art of the Deal catapulted Donald Trump from flashy New York developer to national business icon. With its brash tone and tales of bold dealmaking, it cemented the myth of Trump as the ultimate tycoon — a man with the golden touch, unafraid to speak his mind and take big risks. But behind the scenes, that story wasn’t written by Trump himself. It was crafted by journalist Tony Schwartz, who now says the myth he created is not just misleading — it's dangerous.

Schwartz, who spent 18 months as Trump’s ghostwriter, now says the book is more fiction than fact. “I put lipstick on a pig,” he admitted in a 2016 interview with The New Yorker. He describes his role in creating Trump’s public image as “something I’ll carry with me until the end of my life.”

A Myth Made for Television

At the time, The Art of the Deal was a publishing sensation. It spent 48 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list and made Trump a household name. Years later, it would become the foundation for The Apprentice — the reality TV show that propelled Trump into the living rooms (and psyches) of millions of Americans.

But behind the glossy cover and oversized claims was a very different story. According to Schwartz, Trump barely contributed to the writing process. He was uninterested in deep reflection, couldn’t concentrate for more than a few minutes at a time, and often couldn’t recall basic details of his own life. In desperation, Schwartz resorted to following Trump around his office, eavesdropping on his phone calls just to gather usable material.

What he discovered during that time was unsettling: Trump’s entire public persona was a carefully crafted performance, built on exaggeration, manipulation, and strategic dishonesty.

“Lying Is Second Nature to Him”

Schwartz says that Trump routinely lied about his finances, the details of his business deals, and even his own past. “More than anyone I have ever met,” he said, “Trump has the ability to convince himself that whatever he is saying at any given moment is true — or at least ought to be true.” The ghostwriter said Trump had a “complete lack of conscience” about misleading people and that most of the deals he boasted about in the book were either inflated or completely misrepresented.

One such example: Trump bragged about tricking Holiday Inn into a casino deal by staging a fake construction frenzy. Schwartz later learned that the story was vastly exaggerated — and possibly fictional.

Trump’s own publisher, former Random House head Howard Kaminsky, later laughed at Trump’s claims that he wrote the book himself, saying, “Trump didn’t write a postcard for us.”

A Self-Made Man? Not Quite.

Another central theme of the book — that Trump was a self-made success — has since been debunked by extensive investigative reporting. While The Art of the Deal gives a passing nod to his father Fred, it omits the crucial fact that Fred Trump’s political connections, financial guarantees, and direct cash infusions were essential to Donald’s early career. In fact, Trump’s first big Manhattan development deal was only possible because his father co-signed the loans and lined up favourable tax breaks through city officials.

As journalist Wayne Barrett later put it, “The notion that he’s a self-made man is a joke. But I guess they couldn’t call the book The Art of My Father’s Deals.”

Behind the Curtain: Narcissism, Superficiality, and Chaos

During their time together, Schwartz says he never saw Trump read a book or show interest in learning. “He has no attention span,” Schwartz said, adding that Trump’s world revolved around “money, praise, and celebrity.” He noted that Trump’s office was more like a stage than a workplace, where everything was designed to impress visitors and dominate headlines.

The idea that Trump hides a more thoughtful, nuanced version of himself off-camera? “There isn’t,” Schwartz insists. “There is no private Trump.”

He kept a journal while writing the book, noting how exhausting and “deadening” it was to spend time with Trump. The experience left him feeling hollow, eventually prompting him to leave ghostwriting altogether and write a book about the search for meaning in life.

A Warning Too Late?

By the time Trump launched his presidential campaign in 2015, Schwartz felt that the fictional persona he had helped construct had become dangerously real. When Trump proudly declared at his campaign launch, “We need a leader that wrote The Art of the Deal,” Schwartz was stunned — not just by the lie, but by how easily it was accepted.

“If he could lie about that on Day One,” he thought, “he is likely to lie about anything.”

Trump went on to tell voters that he never fails, that he’s the ultimate negotiator, that he wrote the best business book of all time. And people believed him — many still do. But Schwartz says they shouldn’t. Nearly every claim in The Art of the Deal was inflated, spun, or strategically edited. “I created a character far more winning than Trump actually is,” he said. “The truth is, I made him look better than he was. Much better.”

A Work of Fiction, Not a Manual for Success

Looking back, Schwartz no longer sees The Art of the Deal as a business memoir. He sees it as a piece of propaganda — one that helped unleash a man he now considers pathologically self-centred and deeply unfit for office.

In truth, the book is a masterclass in marketing, not dealmaking. It constructs an image, sells a persona, and disguises fiction as fact. Beyond a few insights into Trump’s personality — most of them troubling — the book offers little of genuine value. In Schwartz’s own words: “I created a myth. And I regret it deeply.”

Anyone who still believes The Art of the Deal as a serious guide to business or leadership is, frankly, being taken in by that myth. To all intents and purposes — apart from the truths about Trump’s character — it is a work of fiction. And taking it seriously is a mistake.


Original reporting by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker, 18 July 2016.
Read the full article here: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all
Main Article Written by Jane Mayer, Chief Washington Correspondent at The New Yorker.

Thursday, 3 April 2025

Trump's "Liberation Day", $TRUMP Cryptocurrency, Transparency & Putin gets a birthday everyday.

Subject: Comprehensive Report on President Donald Trump's Economic Measures, Cryptocurrency Enterprise, and Transparency Concerns

Date: April 3, 2025


1. Overview

This report consolidates the key developments under President Donald Trump's current term relating to sweeping tariff policies, the launch of the $TRUMP cryptocurrency, alleged mechanisms of political favour-trading, and emerging parallels with authoritarian models of governance. It also addresses the United Kingdom's response, including its post-Brexit capabilities and strategic leverage.



2. "Liberation Day" Tariffs and Global Economic Fallout

On April 2, 2025, President Trump initiated broad-based import tariffs under a programme labelled "Liberation Day." These measures are marketed as tools to revive American industry but have provoked significant domestic and global consequences.

Tariff Details:

  • General Import Tariff: 10% on nearly all foreign goods

  • Country-Specific Increases:

    • China: 34%

    • EU: 20%

    • Japan: 24%

    • Cambodia: Up to 49%

    • United Kingdom: 10%

Economic Effects:

  • The UK has suffered substantial economic losses due to Brexit. Independent estimates, including those from the Centre for European Reform, suggest that by 2025 the UK economy is more than £40 billion smaller annually than it would have been inside the EU.

  • Trade volumes, investment levels, and labour productivity have all been negatively impacted, with many UK-based firms reporting increased costs and decreased market access.

  • The loss of frictionless trade with the EU has not been offset by new trade deals, which have offered only marginal economic benefits.

  • The 10% U.S. tariff now compounds these losses, disproportionately affecting key export sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and pharmaceuticals.

  • A 10% tariff on UK goods adds additional post-Brexit pressure to the UK economy, compounding the losses already incurred since leaving the EU.

  • According to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and Centre for European Reform, Brexit has reduced UK GDP by approximately 4% annually compared to if it had remained in the EU, with trade volumes and investment significantly impacted.

  • The additional US tariffs are expected to worsen this economic drag, particularly affecting sectors reliant on transatlantic trade.

  • While proponents of Brexit promised gains from independent trade policy, there is little evidence of any major economic upside materialising. Trade deals struck post-Brexit (e.g., with Australia or Japan) have delivered minimal GDP impact, often measured in fractions of a percent.

  • In this context, the UK’s lack of influence in EU collective trade retaliation, combined with its direct exposure to US tariffs, raises questions about whether Brexit has achieved any tangible economic benefit.

  • The Dow Jones dropped 1,400 points; S&P 500 and Nasdaq fell by 4% and 5.1%, respectively.

  • U.S. household costs are projected to rise by an average of $1,350 per year.

  • Global economic forecasts have been revised downward amid recession concerns.

International Reactions:

  • China and EU condemned the measures and are considering retaliation.

  • UK Response: The UK launched a four-week consultation on counter-tariffs and proposed incentives to appease U.S. tech firms. Although it lacks EU-scale negotiating power post-Brexit, it retains strategic tools, including:

    • Independent WTO membership

    • Control of bilateral trade deals

    • Defence leverage via key military agreements (e.g., US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement, Polaris Sales Agreement)

    • Strategic intelligence and military collaboration as part of NATO

These elements collectively strengthen the UK’s negotiation stance.


3. $TRUMP Cryptocurrency: Structure, Influence, and Ethics

On January 17, 2025, Trump launched a meme cryptocurrency, $TRUMP, on the Solana blockchain.

Key Facts:

  • Total Issuance: 1 billion tokens

  • Public Sale (ICO): 200 million released

  • Retained Holdings: 800 million coins owned by Trump-affiliated firms

  • Market Capitalisation (within 24 hours): $27+ billion, valuing Trump’s holdings at over $20 billion

  • Revenue Reported by March 2025: $350 million through fees and token sales

Concerns Raised:

  • Conflict of Interest: Trump actively influences market conditions through public policy while profiting directly from token valuations.

  • Regulatory Blind Spots: $TRUMP operates outside traditional campaign finance and lobbying transparency rules.

Potential Use as Influence Tool:

  • Companies or nations could buy $TRUMP tokens en masse to indirectly enrich Trump while signalling allegiance.

  • Loyalty through endorsement or financial engagement may be rewarded with softer policy decisions.

  • The lack of regulatory oversight on crypto raises serious questions about hidden transactions and quid-pro-quo influence.


4. Parallels with Putin’s Consolidation of Power in Russia

The structure and implications of these actions bear a striking resemblance to the methods employed by Vladimir Putin during his rise to and consolidation of power in Russia:

Economic Pressure for Political Loyalty:

  • Putin demanded fealty from oligarchs; those who refused (e.g., Mikhail Khodorkovsky) were prosecuted or exiled.

  • Trump has used tariffs and economic threats to punish critics and reward allies.

Control Through Wealth Mechanisms:

  • Putin controlled oligarchs via access to state resources; Trump’s $TRUMP coin may serve as a modern equivalent, where alignment with Trump’s agenda could imply access to favour or protection.

Undermining Democratic Institutions:

  • Putin systematically eroded press freedom, judicial independence, and electoral integrity.

  • Trump has repeatedly attacked the media, courts, and democratic processes, culminating in attempts to overturn the 2020 election and hinting at authoritarian ambitions.

Cult of Personality:

  • Both leaders have cultivated strongman images and demanded personal loyalty over institutional loyalty.

Though Trump operates within a democratic framework, analysts warn that repeated erosion of norms, coupled with financial self-enrichment via political influence, mirrors early stages of authoritarian consolidation.


5. Presidential Enrichment and Transparency Risks

While past U.S. presidents have monetised their post-office careers, Trump has monetised his presidency in real time:

  • Trump forfeited his $400,000 salary as a symbolic gesture, but gained billions through brand monetisation, real estate deals, and now cryptocurrency.

  • His financial structures allow private gain with limited oversight, giving rise to unprecedented ethical concerns.

Foreign Influence via Crypto:

  • Russian-linked wallets or oligarchs could feasibly buy large amounts of $TRUMP tokens.

  • Blockchain anonymity (especially when paired with mixers or privacy coins) enables hard-to-trace transfers of wealth.

  • Traditional banking scrutiny doesn't apply, making foreign financial influence more plausible.

Though no verified cases of foreign bribery via crypto have been exposed, the infrastructure exists—and oversight remains limited.


6. Conclusion

President Trump’s policies and ventures—most notably the $TRUMP coin—highlight a shift from traditional governance to personal financial gain. His tariff actions have destabilised global markets, while his direct involvement in speculative digital assets raises profound ethical and legal questions.

Combined with authoritarian-style loyalty enforcement and regulatory loopholes, these developments pose a serious challenge to U.S. democratic norms and global economic stability.

Meanwhile, Mr Putin continues to get a Birthday every day, having received nearly everything he could have hoped for: division within the United States, tensions within NATO, a fractured transatlantic alliance, and a dramatic shift in Western media and political focus away from Ukraine. Trump’s actions—whether through intent or consequence—have aligned with the key strategic objectives of the Kremlin.

Ongoing scrutiny, international cooperation, and domestic safeguards are essential to prevent the normalisation of self-enrichment and influence peddling at the highest levels of government. are essential to prevent the normalisation of self-enrichment and influence peddling at the highest levels of government.

Sunday, 30 March 2025

Greenland, Trump, and Echoes of Pre-WWII Expansionism: A Historical Comparison

Introduction President Donald Trump’s statements regarding Greenland have drawn widespread criticism for their tone and implications. Among his most striking remarks were assertions like “We have to have Greenland,” “We’ll go as far as we have to go,” and “We’re going to get it, one way or the other.” These comments, paired with suggestions that Denmark might face tariffs if it refused to cooperate, have led many to compare his rhetoric with authoritarian playbooks. In particular, meaningful parallels can be drawn to Germany’s behaviour before World War II.



This report explores those comparisons in detail, examining the tone, tactics, and implications of Trump’s Greenland rhetoric in light of historical precedents.

1. Strategic Necessity as Justification Nazi Germany justified its invasions of the Rhineland, Austria (Anschluss), and Czechoslovakia on grounds of strategic or cultural necessity. Hitler argued that Germany needed these territories to defend itself or unify German-speaking peoples.

Similarly, Trump claimed:

  • “We have to have Greenland”

  • “If we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security”

  • “The world needs us to have Greenland”

These statements echo the same logic: that strategic interest overrides sovereignty. This justification is especially troubling when no clear threat or necessity exists—given that the U.S. already operates a major base in Greenland (Thule Air Base) with full cooperation from Denmark.

2. Disregard for Sovereignty and Consent Germany annexed Austria and Sudetenland despite both regions being sovereign. The justification was again national interest or the protection of ethnic Germans. The consent of the population was either manufactured or deemed irrelevant.

Trump and his allies, including J.D. Vance, have repeatedly claimed that the people of Greenland want to become Americans. However, Greenlandic leadership and public statements have made it clear that Greenland is not for sale and that there is no public appetite for becoming part of the United States. This misrepresentation echoes tactics used by authoritarian regimes to manufacture justification for territorial claims.

One of Trump’s most alarming alleged statements (reported by media, though not confirmed in original footage) is:

  • “Whether they wish to become Americans or not is secondary.”

While the rest of his statements are verifiable on video, this particular line was attributed via secondary sources. If accurate, it clearly indicates a belief that sovereignty and local wishes are subordinate to American interests.

This tactic has historical parallels with:

  • Nazi Germany, which claimed it was acting in the interest of ethnic Germans in Austria and the Sudetenland regardless of broader consent.

  • Modern Russia has claimed that populations in Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk wished to be part of Russia, despite international condemnation and evidence of coercion and manufactured referenda.

3. Use of Economic Coercion Pre-WWII Germany used a mix of diplomacy, propaganda, and economic pressure to isolate and intimidate countries like Austria and Czechoslovakia before annexing them.

Trump similarly suggested that Denmark might face tariffs or trade repercussions if it refused to allow Greenland to become American territory. While this has not yet materialised, it remains a tool that Trump could use to put pressure on Denmark. The threat of using economic levers to override diplomatic resistance is a hallmark of coercive foreign policy.

4. Undermining Alliances and Multilateral Frameworks Germany’s actions in the 1930s consistently undermined international agreements, especially the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler routinely defied pacts and operated unilaterally.

Trump has similarly:

  • Questioned the U.S. commitment to NATO

  • Publicly insulted NATO allies

  • Pursued unilateral decisions that ignored traditional alliance structures

Attempting to obtain Greenland through threats or economic pressure, rather than alliance-based diplomacy, mirrored a go-it-alone strategy with dangerous precedents.

5. Key Differences (for balance and accuracy): While the rhetorical similarities are clear, it is also important to note the key differences:

  • Trump has not used military force to pursue Greenland, although he has repeatedly hinted that "we’ll go as far as we have to go," suggesting it could be an option.

  • The U.S. formally remains a democracy, but Trump’s attempts to constrain democratic institutions and consolidate executive power raise legitimate concerns about authoritarian drift.

  • No actual annexation attempt has occurred, though statements like “we’re going to get it, one way or the other” and responding “I think it will happen” when asked about annexation, indicate clear intent or desire, even if not acted upon yet.

  • Domestic and international pushback against the Greenland idea was immediate and strong

These factors distinguish Trump’s actions from actual authoritarian expansionism, though they do not negate the dangerous tone and precedent.

6. Propaganda, Lies, and the Repetition of Falsehoods Trump is widely known for making misleading and false statements. Independent fact-checkers counted over 30,000 false or misleading claims during his first term in office. This approach echoes the propaganda strategies of authoritarian regimes.

Both Nazi Germany and modern Russia under Putin have used the principle, often attributed to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels: “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” By consistently misrepresenting public sentiment in Greenland and justifying coercive actions through strategic falsehoods, Trump’s messaging follows a similar pattern. Repetition of untruths to legitimise controversial ambitions is a hallmark of disinformation campaigns used to manipulate public opinion and international perception.

7. Historical Context: How Greenland Became Part of Denmark Greenland’s status as part of the Kingdom of Denmark dates back centuries—long before the United States even existed. In the early 14th century, the Norwegian crown claimed sovereignty over Greenland. When Norway entered into a union with Denmark in 1380, Greenland came under Danish rule through the Kalmar Union. Although Norway and Denmark eventually separated in 1814, Greenland remained with Denmark.

In the 20th century, Greenland’s colonial status evolved. It became an integral part of the Kingdom of Denmark in 1953, and was granted home rule in 1979. In 2009, Greenland assumed further self-government, although foreign affairs and defence remain under Danish control.

This long-standing connection to Denmark and Greenland’s modern autonomy make any claim by an external power—such as the United States—both historically and legally baseless.

8. Geographic and Legal Realities: Canada’s Proximity to Greenland Geographically, Canada lies closer to parts of Greenland than the United States, particularly via the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canada shares maritime boundaries with Greenland in the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans, and both countries have historically cooperated on environmental, indigenous, and Arctic security matters.

While Canada has made no claim to Greenland, the notion that the U.S. has a more legitimate claim based on proximity or strategic need is further undermined by this geographic context. If such a flawed logic were applied, Canada would be equally or more justified in asserting influence—yet it has always respected Greenland’s sovereignty and Denmark’s administration.

Conclusion Trump’s remarks about Greenland—whether asserting strategic necessity, dismissing local consent, or threatening economic penalties—mirror elements of authoritarian and pre-WWII rhetoric. These are not harmless words. Language like “We’ll get it one way or the other” reflects a mindset where power and entitlement override diplomacy, respect, and international norms.

Historical comparisons are always imperfect, but they serve a vital role in reminding us where certain patterns can lead. Even without military action, the normalisation of this kind of rhetoric weakens alliances, emboldens adversaries, and risks taking Western democracies down a darker path.

Greenland is not just a territory; it has become a litmus test for whether international cooperation and respect for sovereignty still hold sway in the 21st century.

Sources and Visual References

  • Wikipedia: "Greenland under Norwegian rule", "Kalmar Union", "Greenland (Kingdom of Denmark)"

  • World Atlas: Historical maps of Greenland and the Danish Realm

  • Vivid Maps: "Map of Greenland (1791)"

  • Bowen’s Map of Old Greenland (1747)

  • Firstpost video clips and Instagram footage of Trump statements

  • FactCheck.org & Washington Post Fact Checker: Trump’s false or misleading claims (2017–2020)

  • Pew Research Center: Public opinion data on US global image under Trump

  • AP News, Reuters, and The Times (UK): Coverage of Trump–Greenland negotiations

  • Government of Canada: Arctic foreign policy and maritime boundary agreements with Greenland

  • Numerous YouTube videos of Trump actually speaking on Greenland

Visuals:

Tuesday, 25 March 2025

The Legal and Ethical Record of Donald J. Trump - So Far, theres more to come


The Legal and Ethical Record of Donald J. Trump

Prepared: March 2025
Purpose: To provide a fully referenced and accurate overview of Donald J. Trump's criminal convictions, civil settlements, bankruptcies, allegations, and other ethical concerns, with links to reputable sources, related to the above document.

It's not complete because, as there is no smoke without fire, there will be other acts that are not known yet or maybe never will be known. But the above document is as factual as it gets and all credits to the original writer Ventzi Nelson.

The Fraud, illegal actions, lies, and misrepresentations continue at an astonishing rate.

What is very clear is that Donald J. Trump should not be in the position he is. Had it not been for Deutsche Bank baking him back in the 90s. He wouldn't be in the position he is and one has to wonder why they backed him when no one else would and why they wouldn't release any details when requested.

NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIRE


1. Criminal Convictions

Falsifying Business Records (May 2024)
Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in connection with hush money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. Prosecutors argued that these payments were part of a broader effort to suppress damaging stories and illegally influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, by preventing negative publicity that could have swayed voters. The falsification of records was tied to reimbursements made to Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, who paid Daniels $130,000 to stay silent about the alleged affair.

  • Verdict: Guilty on all counts.
  • Sentencing: Trump received an unconditional discharge on January 10, 2025. This means that although he was found guilty, the court chose not to impose any custodial sentence, probation, or fine. Legal analysts suggest the lenient sentence was due to his age, lack of prior convictions, and the non-violent nature of the offense—though it remains controversial given the felony status of the convictions.

2. Sexual Misconduct Allegations

More than 25 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct spanning four decades. These include:

  • E. Jean Carroll: Found by a jury in 2023 to have been sexually abused by Trump in the 1990s. In 2024, Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million in defamation damages for continuing to deny the incident.
  • Jessica Leeds: Alleged Trump groped her during a flight in the early 1980s.
  • Rachel Crooks: Said Trump forcibly kissed her at Trump Tower in 2005.
  • Jill Harth: Accused Trump of attempted rape in the 1990s.
  • Natasha Stoynoff, Summer Zervos, Kristin Anderson, and others have made similar allegations.
  • Court Records: Available via PACER
  • Sources: BBC, Washington Post


3. Election Interference

2020 Election Overturn Efforts

Trump was federally indicted in 2023 for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The indictment, issued by Special Counsel Jack Smith, included four felony counts involving:

  • Pressuring Georgia officials, including Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, to "find" votes.
  • Orchestrating a fake electors scheme in multiple battleground states.
  • Attempting to obstruct the certification of electoral votes by Congress on January 6, 2021.
  • Disseminating knowingly false claims about voting machines and fraud.
  • Court Document: DOJ Indictment PDF
  • Sources: AP News

4. Financial Crimes and Tax Fraud

Trump Organization Fraud Case (2023)
A New York civil court ruled that Trump and his company fraudulently overstated asset values to secure loans and insurance. The case was brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

  • The judge imposed over $450 million in penalties, including interest.
  • Trump and his sons were temporarily barred from conducting business in New York.
  • Official Filings: NY AG Website
Tax Avoidance Schemes

5. Bankruptcies and Business Collapses

Trump or his businesses have filed for bankruptcy six times (mostly related to casinos and hotels):

  • Trump Taj Mahal (1991)
  • Trump Plaza (1992)
  • Trump Castle (1992)
  • Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts (2004)
  • Trump Entertainment Resorts (2009)
  • Trump Shuttle (1992 – defaulted on loans)
Additionally, several ventures failed:
  • Trump University (closed after fraud lawsuit)
  • Trump Vodka
  • Trump Steaks
  • Trump Mortgage
  • GoTrump.com travel site
  • Trump Network vitamin scheme
Source: CNN Business Wikipedia


Deutsche Bank Involvement and Russian Links

  • Deutsche Bank was one of the only major financial institutions that continued to lend to Trump after repeated bankruptcies.
  • Trump owed the bank over $300 million at one point.
  • U.S. and German authorities have investigated possible Russian money laundering through Deutsche Bank accounts connected to Trump.
  • Deutsche Bank has been fined over $600 million for Russian laundering violations (not directly tied to Trump).
  • The bank resisted full cooperation with U.S. congressional investigations during the Trump presidency.
  • Sources: The Guardian, NY Times, Reuters

6. Legal Settlements

  • Trump University (2016): Paid $25 million to settle fraud claims.
  • Trump Foundation (2018): Dissolved by court order after admitting misuse of charitable funds.
  • Housing Discrimination (1973): Settled after Trump properties were accused of racial bias in rental practices.
  • Stormy Daniels Defamation (2018): Ordered to pay over $293,000 in legal fees.
  • Trump Social (2025): Fined over investor fraud claims.
  • Sources: CNN, NPR

7. Impeachment Proceedings

  • First Impeachment (2019): Abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for pressuring Ukraine to investigate political rival Joe Biden.
  • Second Impeachment (2021): Incitement of insurrection related to the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021. The House of Representatives charged Trump with inciting violence against the United States government by encouraging supporters to march to the Capitol and 'fight like hell' just before the riot began. During the attack, five people died, including a Capitol Police officer, and over 100 officers were injured. The House voted to impeach him a second time, making him the only U.S. president impeached twice.
  • Despite this, the Senate voted to acquit Trump. Although seven Republican senators joined Democrats in voting to convict, the total fell short of the two-thirds majority (67 votes) required for conviction. Many senators stated that while Trump's rhetoric was inflammatory and irresponsible, they believed the trial was unconstitutional because he was no longer in office, or that the First Amendment protected his speech. Others argued that the evidence did not conclusively prove that Trump intended to incite imminent violence.
  • Trump remains the only U.S. president to be impeached twice. He was acquitted both times by the Senate.
  • Sources: Congressional Record, BBCNPR

8. Epstein Connection

  • Trump was a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s.
  • A 2016 federal lawsuit filed under the pseudonym "Katie Johnson" accused Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of repeatedly raping her in 1994 when she was 13 years old. The suit was filed in California, dismissed for technical reasons, then refiled in New York.
  • The case was later withdrawn by the plaintiff days before the 2016 election, citing threats and fear for her safety. The plaintiff's legal team reported receiving death threats, and she cancelled a scheduled press conference where she was to speak publicly for the first time.
  • No trial or hearing was held, and no ruling was made on the merits of the allegations.
  • Flight logs show Trump flew on Epstein’s private jet, although less frequently than other associates.
  • Sources: The Independent, The Guardian


9. Marital and Personal Controversies

  • Ivana Trump Divorce (1992): Legal filings included claims of marital rape, later retracted.
  • Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal Affairs: Both alleged extramarital affairs, with payments made to suppress stories during the 2016 campaign.
  • Ongoing Rumours: Post-presidency reports suggest a strained relationship with Melania Trump.
  • Sources: Wall Street Journal

10. Additional Civil and Legal Cases

New York Business Fraud Ruling (Feb 2024)

  • Judge Arthur Engoron ruled Trump and his company engaged in persistent financial fraud.
  • Trump was fined $453.5 million and banned from managing businesses in New York for three years.
  • Source: USA Today

Capitol Riot Civil Lawsuits

  • Trump faces lawsuits by Capitol Police and members of Congress for inciting the January 6 attack.
  • DOJ has partially intervened, arguing Trump may be immune from civil liability.
  • Source: Reuters

OSC Dismissal Case (2025)

  • A lawsuit was filed challenging the dismissal of U.S. Office of Special Counsel head Hampton Dellinger.
  • A temporary restraining order was issued before the case was dropped.
  • Source: NBC News

Timeline of Major Legal and Ethical Events – Donald J. Trump

1973 – Sued by DOJ for racial discrimination in housing rentals (settled).
1991–2009 – Filed for corporate bankruptcy six times (casinos, hotels, airlines).
1990s–2010s – Multiple women accuse Trump of sexual misconduct.
2005 – Trump’s recorded remarks on Access Hollywood aired in 2016, triggering more accusations.
2016 – $130,000 hush money paid to Stormy Daniels via Michael Cohen.
2016 – Trump University settles fraud claims for $25 million.
2018 – Trump Foundation dissolved over misuse of charitable funds.
2019 – First impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
2021 – Second impeachment: incitement of insurrection (January 6 Capitol attack).
2023 – Indicted federally for efforts to overturn 2020 election.
2023 – Civil court rules Trump committed business fraud; fined over $450 million.
2023–2024 – Found liable for sexual abuse and defamation (E. Jean Carroll).
2024 (May) – Convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records.
2025 (Jan) – Sentenced to unconditional discharge.
2025 (Feb–Mar) – Faces lawsuits over Jan 6 riot and legal disputes involving the OSC firing.



Note:
This document will continue to be updated as legal cases evolve or new facts emerge. All efforts have been made to cite reputable, mainstream news and legal sources. Official court documents have been cited where publicly available through court systems like PACER and the New York Unified Court System.

Thursday, 6 March 2025

Is Trump a Russian asset?



Donald Trump and Russian Financial Connections: A Historical Analysis


Introduction

This report examines the historical connections between Donald Trump and Russian financial entities, organized crime, and intelligence networks. It focuses on key events dating back to the 1980s, including real estate transactions, business dealings, and financial struggles, along with subsequent allegations of money laundering and political influence. Additionally, it considers the question raised by various analysts and intelligence experts: Was Donald Trump recruited by the KGB in or before 1987?


Trump's Initial Russian Ties: The 1980s and 1990s

1984: Trump Real Estate and Russian Money Laundering Allegations

In 1984, David Bogatin, a Russian mobster and convicted gasoline bootlegger, purchased five condominiums in Trump Tower for approximately $6 million. The U.S. government later seized these properties, citing them as part of a money-laundering operation for the Russian mafia.

1987: Trump’s Moscow Visit and Potential KGB Influence

In 1987, Trump and his then-wife, Ivana, visited Moscow at the invitation of Soviet ambassador Yuri Dubinin. The trip was fully funded by Soviet officials who were interested in "potential business collaborations" with Trump.

Shortly after his return, Trump placed full-page ads in major newspapers, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Boston Globe, where he criticized U.S. foreign policy. Some analysts have speculated that this marked the beginning of his alignment with Soviet interests.

Ivana Trump and Possible Intelligence Connections

While Ivana Trump was not Russian, she was born in Czechoslovakia, a Soviet-aligned state. Declassified intelligence files from the Czechoslovak Státní bezpečnost (StB), which had close ties to the KGB, indicate that her father, Miloš Zelníček, acted as an informant for the regime. The StB monitored Trump’s business activities and political aspirations as early as the 1970s and 1980s, forwarding reports to Soviet intelligence agencies.

Source: The Guardian

These revelations suggest that while Ivana Trump herself may not have been involved with intelligence services, her familial connections inadvertently provided channels through which information about Donald Trump reached Eastern Bloc intelligence agencies.

Felix Sater and Bayrock Group: Trump’s Russian Financial Links

Felix Sater, a Russian-born businessman with a criminal past, became a managing director of Bayrock Group LLC, a real estate conglomerate headquartered in Trump Tower. Bayrock partnered with Trump in 2005, bringing in foreign financing from sources tied to the former Soviet Union.


Trump’s Financial Struggles and Foreign Money

Trump's Atlantic City Casino Bankruptcies

Between 1991 and 2009, Trump's businesses filed for bankruptcy six times, primarily due to the financial instability of his Atlantic City casinos. The Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza, and Trump Castle all required debt restructuring.

  • Source: Wikipedia
    (Note: Wikipedia compiles information from multiple sources, including legal documents, financial records, and major news outlets. While it can be edited by users, Wikipedia's rigorous citation requirements and editorial oversight ensure that well-sourced information is reliable. In this case, the financial history of Trump is drawn from court filings and financial disclosures.)

Banking Challenges and Alternative Financing

After his casino bankruptcies, Trump found it difficult to secure loans from major U.S. banks. He instead turned to Deutsche Bank, which continued to provide substantial loans for his projects, despite his history of defaults.

Russian Financial Involvement

Reports suggest that Russian entities may have provided financing for Trump’s ventures. In a 2017 interview, Eric Trump allegedly stated, "We don't rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia."


Deutsche Bank's Internal Investigation

Was Trump’s Debt Guaranteed by Russia?

Deutsche Bank conducted an internal review to determine whether loans made to Trump were backed by Russian government guarantees. However, the findings of this investigation have not been publicly disclosed.

In May 2017, Democratic members of the House Financial Services Committee requested information from Deutsche Bank regarding these alleged guarantees. The bank declined to provide a substantive response.

Suspicious Activity Reports and Allegations of Money Laundering

In 2019, Deutsche Bank’s anti–money laundering specialists reportedly recommended filing suspicious activity reports regarding transactions involving Trump and Jared Kushner. However, these recommendations were allegedly ignored by senior bank executives.

Analysis of Deutsche Bank's Actions

  • The lack of disclosure raises significant questions. If Deutsche Bank had found no connection to Russian-backed loans, transparency would have been the logical step.
  • Rejecting internal compliance officers' money-laundering reports is highly unusual, especially given the bank’s previous scandals.
  • Deutsche Bank has a documented history of laundering money for Russian oligarchs, having paid a $630 million fine for laundering $10 billion in Russian funds.
  • Trump continued to receive loans from Deutsche Bank even after multiple defaults, raising concerns about why a bank would repeatedly finance someone with such a poor credit history.

While this does not definitively prove Russian backing, the pattern of behavior from both Deutsche Bank and Trump’s financial dealings suggests something was being hidden.


The 1st part of the attached video covers the question "Is Trump a Russian asset?" with the senator concluding
That Trump has....

  • Expressed from the Oval Office, Russian propaganda that Ukraine started the War.
  • That Zelenskyy is a dictator
  • Gave away key things on the negotiation table before negotiations even started.
    • Said that US would oppose any membership of NATO for Ukraine.
  • Cut off Arms shipments to Ukraine, completely undermining their ability against a much bigger aggressor.
  • Undermined the partnership with Europe which has been essential to security for the last 80 years. Which was a major goal of Putin's.
  • Done everything possible to discredit and demean  Zelenskyy on the international stage along with the shameful press conference where he teamed up with the Vice President to attack Zelenskyy 

 "What else could a Russian asset actually possibly do that Trump hasn't yet done"



Conclusion

Donald Trump’s financial dealings, particularly in real estate, have long been intertwined with Russian entities. The 1980s saw the beginning of his connections with Soviet officials, while the 1990s and early 2000s saw Russian oligarchs and organized crime figures investing in Trump properties. After his financial troubles in Atlantic City, Trump turned to Deutsche Bank and other foreign sources for funding, raising concerns over Russian involvement in his business empire.

Investigations into Trump’s financial ties remain inconclusive, with Deutsche Bank’s internal probe never publicly revealing whether Russian guarantees were involved. However, the connections between Trump’s business operations and Russian financial actors remain a subject of scrutiny and debate.


End of Report

Wednesday, 6 May 2020

COVID-19 ~ 2nd Place for Deaths 3rd Highest Spike in New Cases

On the 5th May 2020, the UK took on the sad crown of 2nd highest deaths from coronavirus in the world.  6th of May we have the 3rd highest spike of new cases in the UK since this started.


Is it strange that the two leaders of the countries with the highest deaths or is it a sad indictment of their complacency and failure to act? With literally more data to hand than most other countries? The evidence was there, all the had to do was prepare for it. Did they? Sadly no not quickly enough, they were severely lacking in their response and even in their belief that COVID-19 was a threat. Comments like "its a hoax" and "I shake hands with everyone" are the evidence of their belief in the threat.

Now some will say, and even Johnson said it today you cant compare countries, well yes I'm going to agree with that. The UK has a population density far higher than most other comparable countries.  Which is the reason we needed to move sooner.

I covered population density here Has Sweden Found The Right Route in a blog about Sweden and its herd immunity route

UK population density per Mi2             = 710
Germany population density per Mi2    = 603
Italy population density per Mi2            = 518
China population density per Mi2         = 377
France population density per Mi2        = 319
Spain population density per Mi2          = 241
USA  population density per Mi2          = 87
Brazil population density per Mi2         = 64
Sweden population density per Mi2      = 60

Knowing that we had a much higher population density, there is no question that the Government should have implemented the stay at home policy earlier than others and not waited.  Had they done that 2 weeks earlier, we might even be coming out the other side of it now.  I guess in their defence people wanted coffins to be convinced but Johnson didn't help that with conflicting information.

I'm still shaking my head at the governments herd immunity path they initially followed and don't forget they had all the figures to hand.  Yet they were still going for that scenario, unbelievable.


Herd immunity in Sweden is a possibility and seems to be working but it's understandable with a population density of just 60 per Mi2 and they have got it wrong with many care home deaths. Herd immunity in the UK was never going to be a possibility with a population density of 710 per Mi2.  Nearly 12 times that of Sweden.

It seems now that having been late to initiate stay at home, Johnson is now making noises about relaxing measures. In my opinion, this is far too early we've just become 2nd place in the world for deaths.

As if to serve as a warning we've had the 3rd highest spike (6,111) in new cases today the 6th May 2020, since this started.  2nd highest was 6,201 on 1st May 2020 and the biggest spike was 8,681 back on 10 April 2020.

Johnson has proved to be a likeable, bumbling, schoolboy character and people have voted for him.

Unfortunately, that don't cut it, it doesn't cover the incompetence, the incongruent comments in briefings to the country. The lies, the misinformation this government has made and continues to make.

I covered the Incompetent brothers Johnson and Trump here

The 100,000 test is a good point in question, why lie? Why not say we set an ambitious target and we missed it but we are carrying on improving until we hit it.  Why send out thousands of test kits to random people that never asked for them and include them in the 100,000 figure.  THEY WERN'T TESTED.

Some will say this is not the time to be holding the Government to account. I say its more imperative that we hold the government to account now because if we let them carry on making the mistakes they are it could have fatal ramifications for some of us and no one knows who.

But it could be you.

Would you really let a driver of a bus, drive over a cliff edge without doing something to stop him?



#nomorelies
#nomoremisinformation










Thursday, 30 April 2020

COVID-19 ~ Johnson and Trump The Incompetent Brothers

Prime Minister's Speech Greenwich, London 3rd February 2020

In case anyone was in any doubt of good old Boris Johnsons thinking prior to coronavirus hitting the UK. I suggest you take a look at the start of this speech made on the 3rd of February 2020.
“And when there is a risk that new diseases such as coronavirus will trigger a panic and a desire for market segregation that go beyond what is medically rational, to the point of doing real and unnecessary economic damage. Then at that moment humanity needs some government somewhere that is willing at least to make the case powerfully for freedom of exchange” - Boris Johnson
Johnson then goes on to tell us, or those that are concerned about what sort of trade deal the UK might end up with the USA, that they should grow up.

Well, it turned out that he was the one who needed to grow up, particularly after his "I shook hands with everyone" speech at a briefing a month later to the day.
"I was at a hospital the other night, where I think there was a few coronavirus patients and I shook hands with everybody! you'll be pleased to know and I continue to shake hands" ~ Boris Johnson 3rd March 2020
Inspirational and outstanding leadership in getting the message across....NOT.  This isn't leadership this is pure childish incompetence.

Yet people still say he's doing a good job, it beggars belief and is the same blind faith exhibited by those followers of Trump. A world leader that lurches from one idiotic statement to another and then claims he's misquoted or his other favourite "its fake news".

Strange that the two leaders who were prepared to sacrifice unknown numbers of the population are now facing seeing the biggest death totals.  The UK is not there yet, but slowly, day by day the UK is overtaking other countries in that area. Will we make number two?  Highly probable in the next few days but certainly in the next few weeks.

But the sheer incompetence of both Johnson and Trump does not remain to be seen it's on plain view.

It's not like coronavirus stealthily crept up on us, we had the warnings, it was plain to see. There was no surprise, it was obvious what was coming to all those with a mediocre of common sense.

Unfortunately, common sense seems to be low in both Johnson and Trump and it nearly cost Johnson his life, if we can believe that part of the saga.



The UK is currently 3rd in the dubious rankings of coronavirus deaths. We should have been lower, we were warned, we knew it was coming. Only the governments slow reaction has put us in what will be 2nd place in the next few days.



The government also failed to plan correctly and put in place stocks of non-perishables, like masks and gowns after the pandemic exercise in 2016, Exercise Cygnus.  The report has never been released, I wonder why?
Covid-19 strategies: Britain planned for herd immunity while Asia intended to contain virus
Britain had prepared for a herd immunity strategy to contain Covid-19, while other countries focused on enhanced testing capacity
Who got it right?

Well it's plain to see from the numbers that certainly the UK and the USA didn't, especially with the advanced warning both countries had. Asian countries have got off lightly with regard to deaths so it was possible.

There is one caveat to this.  Were the deaths enough to get near to herd immunity? Because for every death there are x number of people that have had it and had mild or no symptoms.

Have the deaths been enough to get near the 60-80% needed for herd immunity to work?  As we have no reliable test, or any reliable evidence, as yet, that if you've had it you get immunity. That remains to be seen when the 2nd wave comes. The 2nd wave in the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic killed far more than the 1st wave.

So hold onto your hats, we could be in for a bumpy ride and with the likes of Johnson and Trump in charge what could possibly go wrong.....

LOTS!



UPDATE 06 May 2020
6 days after I posted this blog we surpassed Italy in deaths and the UK took on the sad crown of the country with the 2nd highest deaths in the world.

LINKS

Sunday, 26 April 2020

COVID-19 ~ Trumps ludicrous disinfectant suggestion and the fallout from it.


I know there will be lots of blind followers of Trump that will think that he's brilliant and follow him regardless of what lies and misinformation he spews out. In general, there is so much of it it's just not worth commenting on, you would spend a lifetime checking through it all. He is another pathological liar which is why he constantly comes out with so much rubbish, he actually believes what he's saying, which is all the more dangerous. In fact he a Narcissistic pathological liar.
The President of the United States declared at a briefing yesterday: 
‘and then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks out in a minute, one minute, and is there a way we can do something like that?’ - ‘By injection inside, or almost a cleaning. ‘Cos you see, it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.’ - 'So that your going to have to use medical Doctors with' - 'but it sounds interesting to me'
So there is one thing on this disinfectant comment in the briefing. Regardless of what he said, whether he said it, whether he meant what everyone heard or interpreted it in the right way. (Then again things shouldn't be open to interpretation).  One thing that cuts through all that crap.
  1. Trump should not be using a briefing that goes out to the whole world to try and make himself look intelligent or knowledgable about a subject he clearly knows absolutely nothing about and has no qualifications for, as he himself said 'Im not a Doctor'.  The place to brainstorm even stupid ideas,  is in meetings with those who have the scientific knowledge to either expand on them or explain why its an idea that's going nowhere. It's as simple as that, he shouldn't have said what he said in a briefing, he was just trying to pretend he's a clever ideas person and he's not.  END OF.  There is no excuse for those type of comments in a press briefing.
Now we've got that one point over we can have a look at what was said and what wasn't.  In these videos, you can see exactly what was said. Also the myriad of graphic images of which there are too many to produce them all here.

SOAPBOX OPINION...
Basically, if you wanted to go all out and make yourself look like an absolute idiot to the rest of the world you would struggle to beat this one.


Dr. Birx's reaction to Trump's disinfectant suggestion

Trump then claimed he was being sarcastic

He clearly wasn't being sarcastic, he was clearly trying to be the look at me I'm clever with another of his numerous I have a good brain quotes.

Trump Knows More Than Anybody, And Nobody Knows More

Trump's Way Of Speaking Is 'Oddly Adolescent'

Trump vs Trump on Coronavirus: the US President's changing tone in just a few weeks

Any questions Trump doesn't like is put down by belittling and bullying comments and the comment your just fake news, when in fact most fake news or misinformation is spewed by trump.

Trump's musings spurred a media, manufacturer,  frenzy around the world with Doctors and Scientists apparently, all taking Trump's comments the wrong way. Maybe Trump needs to work on communication skills.

Various images




















As an update, this YouTube video came to my attention and shows the cutting involved particularly by the BBC. Not that I saw any BBC clips but here it is anyway.  {Updated 27/04/20)


BBC lies & fakery: editing and manipulating Trump “sunlight and bleach” press briefing

My comment would be
Doesn't really get away from the fact that Trump shouldn't be pontificating in a press conference about ideas such as that and why are they are telling everyone that bleach kills the virus? I thought that was common knowledge, so makes no sense. They were saying it as if it was some great revelation, very strange.  He did also say "I then asked the question ....." seemingly making it look like he was the perpetrator of these questions but maybe that can be attributed to the cutting. He's always trying to make himself look like the one with all the knowledge the superior intellect and regularly says so ...he probably should have kept his mouth shut and let the scientists deal with the science, then there would be no ammunition. Nothing is as it seems.



Updated 27/04/20

Seems only correct to post the full briefing, certainly doesn't change my opinion. 





Various LINKS


Friday, 7 June 2019

So you think you know the real Donald Trump

Thought id do a little checking on this meme from 2016 doing the rounds again  I'll give it 3 out of 6 that are provably factually correct.


1. Donald Trump sheltered Jennifer Hudson rent free after her family was murdered.
POSSIBLY TRUE:  As the reports stem from the man himself in comments made to Peoples Magazine its difficult to know the truth. Many media reports say that he did but hudson has never, as far as I can tell, confirmed or denied it. 
2. Donald Trump sued the city of palm beach when he bought a segregated club, Mar A Lago, to open it to Jews and Blacks.
NOT TRUE:  Half truths and misinformation worded to throw a different moralistic light on a situation. However if we go by the actual statement that Trump bought a segregated club to open it to Jews and Blacks. He didn't. When he bought it in 1985 it was an estate and not a club. It wasn't until over 5 years later that Trump moved to change the property into a private club in the 90s.  So did he buy a segregated club to open it to Jews and Blacks - NO
3. Donald Trump paid to ensure a Mexican American boy would graduate from college when he saw a news story about his terminally ill Mom.
NOT TRUE:  Trump was a financial partner in Fundanything.com whist Trump promoted the boys plight via twitter after meeting Melisa Young 2005 Miss Wisconsin. He never paid any money himself and the money was crowd funded via fundanything.com. The crowd funding page was started by Chelsea Cooley Altman Miss USA 2005.
4. Donald Trump dispatched his plane to fly a sick jewish boy for special care when he heard no airline would accommodate his medical equipment.
TRUE: Occured in July 1988
5. Donald Trump sent $10,000 to hero bus driver Darnell Barton after seeing a news story about how he saved a woman from jumping off a bridge.
TRUE: Occured in 2013
6. Donald Trump gave the job of constructing Trump tower to Barbra Res, making her the 1st woman in history to build a skyscraper.
TRUE: Occured in 1980


LINKS
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/so-you-think-you-know-donald-trump/

1. https://people.com/celebrity/donald-trump-shelters-jennifer-hudson
1. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jennifer-hudson-very-safe_n_143042
1. https://www.today.com/popculture/trump-takes-jennifer-hudson-family-wbna27667541
1. https://www.businessinsider.com/2008/11/in-other-trump-news-today-he-s-protecting-jennifer-hudson?r=US&IR=T
1. https://www.instagram.com/p/BMjZSoNA9wz/?hl=en
2. https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2016/12/how-donald-trump-beat-palm-beach-society-and-won-the-fight-for-mar-a-lago
3. https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/274624-ex-miss-wisconsin-tears-up-thanking-trump-at-rally
3. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=440460079469009&id=100005150620207
4. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-flies-sick-boy/
4. Donald Trump dispatched his plane
5. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/396148779088609280
5. https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump-gives-hero-bus-driver-10-000-10429580
5. Donald Trump Gives $10,000 Gift To Hero Bus Driver
6. https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1291&dat=19801225&id=2ggyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=K40DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6833,5204145&hl=en