Saturday 30 November 2019

How many trees can you plant?


Now, 2bn trees over 20 years, is 100,000,000 trees per year, or just under 2,000,000 per week. This equates to approximately 200 trees every minute of every day, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 20 years!

So big numbers are always scary for those that can't comprehend them.  However coming from a Project Management point of view how would we deal with this.  Well we would need a workforce for a start, but how big would that work force be?  and the trees would have to be planted all over the UK so lets break it down into counties.

There are 98 counties in the UK.

Now some counties would have the land to plant more trees and others less,  but for the benefits of example and keeping it simple


Total Trees  2,000,000,000 (2 billion in 20 years)
Per Year      100,000,000
Per Month   8,333,333
per week      1,923,077
per day         274,725

But lets not work a 7 day week so we will only work 5 days a week.

Per 5 days equals 384,615  trees per day.

An experienced tree planter will plant 1500 trees a day. For the benefits of clarity, we are talking saplings and not full grown trees.

But lets go low and take a 1/3rd of that so we will work on each of our team members planting 500 trees/ saplings a day.

Great Britain[edit]Planting in Britain is commonly referred to as restocking, when it takes place on land that has recently been harvested. When occurring on previously unforested land it is known as new planting.[8] Under the British system, in order to acquire the necessary permissions to clearcut, the landowner must agree a management plan with the Forestry Commission (the regulatory body for all things forestry) which must include proposals for the re-establishment of tree cover on the land. Planting contractors will be engaged by the landowner/management company, a contract drawn up and work will typically take place from November to April when most of the transplants are dormant.
Planting is part of the rotational nature of much British plantation forestry. Productive tree crops are planted and subsequently clearcut. Some form of soil cultivation may take place and the ground is then restocked. Where the production of timber is a management priority, a prescribed stocking density must be achieved. For coniferous species this will be a minimum of 2500 stems per hectare at year 5 (from planting). Planting at this density has been shown to favour the development of straighter knot-free logs.
Planters are normally paid under piece work terms and an experienced worker will plant around 1500 trees a day under most conditions.

So far we need to plant 384,615  trees per day over 5 days a week.
Which means at 500 trees a day  we will need a work force of  769 people

Now we have 98 counties in the UK so lets divide the workforce up into the counties.

769 / 98 = 7.8   so we need 8 people in each county planting trees.  Think that's easily achievable don't you?

Now remember we only used a 1/3rd of the amount of trees that an experienced planter can do so this figure is low and means would take into account bad weather etc.

So the question is do you think we could employ 8 people planting trees in all the counties in the UK for 5 days a week for 20 years.

Not looking quite so silly now is it?

Ambitious maybe but definitely possible.


Friday 22 November 2019

Election: A log of Lies, misinformation, fake news and misc.




Tories set up fake Labour manifesto website as election disinformation spree continues  - 21/11/19

Labour MP Jess Phillips condemns new 'misleading' video shared by official Tory account - 21/11/19

Tories pretend to be factchecking service during leaders' debate  - 19-11-19
More lies and misinformation from the Tories as they rebrand their twitter account to make it look like a fact checker.
  • Should be illegal.




General election 2019: Labour Party hit by second cyber-attack - 12-Nov-19


General election 2019: 'Cyber-attack' on Labour Party digital platforms - 12-Nov-19


General election 2019: Tories step up attack on Labour spending plans - 12-Nov-19
  • No manifesto or spending plans have been released yet, by either party

BBC apologises for using wrong Remembrance Sunday clip - 11-Nov-19
  • Indefensible again,  why were they even looking at archive clips?


Conservatives post misleading edited video to suggest Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary can’t answer question  - 06-Nov-19


LINKS
https://boris-johnson-lies.com/?fbclid=IwAR1cs1uRl3vdDeljska0vAS-v_pCPwUPZgQps9266L4BQQ0PPARl_FsQyFE
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservatives-labour-website-purchase-jeremy-corbyn-margaret-beckett-vote-a9231301.html?


Boris Johnson's car crash head to head with Jeremy Corbyn

Corbyn played a mastercard and I didnt realise how much of a mastercard at the time.  That came to light later.

After the leader election debate between Corbyn and Johnson I was of the opinion that it was a bit of a draw with noone coming out on top, however events that came to light after that changed my opinion.

During the debate Corbyn waved a freedom of information document around on negotiations between the Tories and the US which had been heavily redacted (for redacted read censored). 


“Every single line of this document, redacted out. A document here, of US-UK negotiations. Summary of specific negotiating objectives: full market access for US products to our National Health Service. You’re going to sell out our NHS to the United States and big pharma.”  ~ Jeremy Corbyn 

Now here's why I now feel that it was a car crash for BloJo......

  1. The Tories obviously had the rebranded twitter account ready to go live if they got hit with something that they couldn't counter and this was it.
  2. Soon after Corbyn made that statement the rebranded FAKE factcheck branding was put up on the twitter account trying to claim Corbyn was the liar to cover the impact of the documents.
  3. If the document was not factual why didn't the Tories mentioned it afterwards. They never claimed the document was fake. They never claimed it was incorrect.
  4. It was so important they were prepared to risk having their twitter account suspended by contravening twitter's rules.
  5. Every Tory i've seen interviewed since claimed they did it to exposed Corbyn lies, never mentioning the document.
  6. The fact that they havnt claimed the document is a pack of lies is telling.  If the document was incorrect or fake BloJo could have easily said so in front of millions of people.  He didn't, all he could do was bluster his way through it and continue with the Tory mantra that the NHS is not for sale which now people can see is the biggest lie of the lot.
  7. Since then BloJo has pulled out of a 2nd head to head debate scheduled on channel 4 as they obviously know its going to get mentioned again and they cant counter it because the document is factual.
  8. Regardless what the Tories claim the NHS has been being sold off to private companies for years. It's just done stealthily with Virgin Care one of the biggest health care providers.

Pollster YouGov found Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn were roughly neck-and-neck in the contest, with 51 per cent of the audience saying the Tory leader won and 49 per cent saying the Labour leader. But among undecided voters Mr Corbyn was judged to have won a decisive victory, with a 59-41 per cent lead over Boris Johnson as best performer among that group.







LINKS
Election debate: Corbyn accuses Boris Johnson of wanting to ‘sell NHS to Trump’ after Brexit
Leaders' election TV debate cancelled after Boris Johnson refuses to take part
Virgin awarded almost £2bn of NHS contracts in the past five years
Johnson v Corbyn: The ITV Debate | ITV News


Thursday 14 November 2019

The BBC's absolutely indefensible Bias against Jeremy Corbyn continues

Will Jeremy Corbyn's long march lead to power?
In 2009 at a Palestine Solidarity meeting he referred to “our friends from Hezbollah” and “our friends from Hamas”. His defence, when criticised, was similar to his stated reasons for meeting Irish republicans. He told Channel 4 News that “to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you profoundly disagree”.
Note the last part of that quote  “to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you profoundly disagree”

Picture 1 posted about 2am in morning
It's interesting that the image on this link was one that was obviously put up to make Corbyn look like a communist. See picture 1 above posted about 2am and picture 2 below, by 11:44 the image on the website had been changed).

I remember thinking well if that's not biased reporting from the BBC I dont know what is.

The absolute lies, misinformation and hypocrisy is literally beyond belief.

Picture 2 changed by 11:44 Am
This was run only a few days after the BBC had "Accidently" run a video of remembrance day from 2016 making BloJo look good and Corbyn look bad.

In reality it was BloJo that looked dishevelled, made several cock ups and laid the wreath upside down.  Still the media only had time to shout that Corbyn hadn't bowed enough.   Apparently there isn't a right or wrong way to lay a wreath, but I guarantee there would have been if Corbyn had put it the wrong way up.

One looks like hes been out at a nightclub all night and the other is Jeremy Corbyn.

BloJo Smarter on left in 2016 against on right looking like been pulled through a hedge backwards 2019

BBC apologises for using wrong Remembrance Sunday clip

Then whilst listening to Radio 5 live I heard the interviewer saying "but surely this is just going to let Corbyn into number 10" not Labour but Corbyn.  Any references on the other side were not made about Johnson but the Conservatives.

Absolutely indefensible Bias.

They have done exactly the same before in 2018 positioning Corbyn on a screen next to a picture of the Kremlin.

Apparently it was the curved screen, yeah right.

Did the BBC edit a photo of Jeremy Corbyn to make him look close to Russia?

BBC rejects complaints over Jeremy Corbyn's 'Russian' hat



LINKS
It’s not a conspiracy. Boris Johnson is just bad at laying wreaths and mopping floors



Tuesday 12 November 2019

I received this today, more totally fake news from the Tories.

  1. Why is it fake? Labour hasn't released its manifesto yet so how could they possibly know. This is just a bunch of made up guesses.
  2. Its absolute rubbish the only people paying a bit more tax are those top 5% of people, with the Tories you see your money given away to those that don't need it.
  3. The Tories haven't released a manifesto yet either and it looks like they don't intend to until towards the end of the election, what are they scared of?
  4. In 2017 the Tories never released any financial statement and the country let them get away with it, a blank cheque!
  5. In 2010 the Tories claimed we were bankrupt, but managed in 2014 to give away 94 billion in tax concessions to big corporations?  Basically they lied and are still lying through their teeth to this day.
  6. BloJo is the biggest snake oil charmer of them all, with all the lies and misinformation he's spread why would anyone believe a word he says?
  7. Through the worst austerity for decades the Tories have added over 800 billion to UK debt since 2010

Dear Gary,

The Cost of Corbyn has been revealed – and Labour's £1.2 trillion spending plans would hit you straight in the pocket.

It would cost the average worker a month’s wages in higher taxes to pay for Corbyn’s reckless spending.

Under Corbyn’s plans, you’d have to pay an extra £2,400 in tax. Every single year.

A new homes tax. A new gifts tax. Higher fuel duty. Higher aviation duty. The list goes on.

If Corbyn wins this election, he’s not just going to run out of money. He’s going to run out of new taxes.

And that means chaos for our economy.

The latest jobs data out today showed just how important it is to make the right choices on our economy. Employment is up, unemployment is down and wages are rising.

Only the Conservatives can be trusted to build on the decade of recovery. Don't let Corbyn and McDonnell bury it under a mountain of new debt and higher taxes.






LINKS
https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicspending/bulletins/ukgovernmentdebtanddeficitforeurostatmaast/march2019