Showing posts with label misinformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misinformation. Show all posts

Wednesday, 6 May 2026

Nigel Farage: The Man Who Sold Britain Brexit and Now Wants to Sell the NHS

 



Nigel Farage: The Professional Outsider Who Keeps Cashing In

Nigel Farage has built an entire political career pretending to be the bloke in the pub standing up for ordinary people. The reality is rather different.

For nearly three decades, Farage has managed to position himself as the anti-establishment rebel while spending most of his career inside politics, media, wealthy donor circles and billionaire-funded campaigns.

He presents himself as a patriot. Yet some of his closest political relationships and public statements repeatedly raise serious questions about whose interests he actually serves.

Not conspiracy theories. Not internet nonsense. His own words. His own actions. His own donors.


The NHS Question: Farage’s Own Words

Farage and Reform UK now insist they support healthcare being “free at the point of use”. But that carefully chosen phrase avoids the real issue: how healthcare is funded.

Because Farage has repeatedly argued against the NHS being funded through general taxation.

In 2012 he said:

I think we’re going to have to move to an insurance-based system of healthcare.

In 2025 he again said he was “open to anything” regarding an insurance-based NHS model.

He has also said:

“I do not want it funded through general taxation. It does not work.”

That matters because once you move away from taxation funding, you fundamentally change what the NHS is.

Farage supporters claim he means a European insurance model like France or Germany. Critics fear it becomes a slippery slope toward something far closer to the nightmare healthcare mess of the United States.

Either way, it is simply dishonest to pretend he has never advocated major structural NHS change. The quotes exist. On camera.


Brexit: The Most Expensive Political Sales Pitch in Modern British History

Farage still behaves as though Brexit was an unqualified triumph betrayed by others.

Yet study after study has found Brexit damaged UK trade, reduced investment growth and weakened productivity. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated long-term UK productivity would be roughly 4% lower than if Britain had remained in the EU.

The promises sold during the referendum now look painfully familiar:

  • Easier trade
  • Economic boom
  • Reduced bureaucracy
  • Huge NHS savings
  • Minimal disruption

Instead, Britain got years of instability, trade friction, labour shortages, soaring bureaucracy for exporters and stagnant growth.

And Farage? He simply moved on to the next outrage cycle.

That is the trick with career populists. The mess is never their fault. The answer is always more populism.


Trump: Farage the Cheerleader

Farage’s relationship with Donald Trump goes far beyond ordinary political alignment.

He has repeatedly travelled to the US to campaign alongside Trump, appearing at rallies and praising him in terms that would embarrass a North Korean state broadcaster.

At an Arizona rally in 2020, Farage called Trump:

the most resilient and bravest person I've ever met in my life.

This despite:

  • Trump’s repeated false election claims
  • the January 6 Capitol attack aftermath
  • endless misinformation
  • multiple criminal indictments
  • documented false statements numbering in the tens of thousands according to major fact-checking databases

Farage consistently positioned himself not as a cautious ally, but as one of Trump’s loudest UK amplifiers.

It increasingly looked less like diplomacy and more like political fan fiction.


Putin, Russia and “Provocation”

Farage has spent years trying to walk a careful line on Russia.

He has criticised Putin at times. But he has also repeatedly echoed Kremlin-friendly talking points.

Most controversially, he said the EU and NATO had “provoked” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine through eastern expansion.

He previously said Putin was the world leader he most admired “as an operator”.

Critics from multiple parties accused him of parroting Kremlin narratives.

Now, to be fair, saying NATO expansion contributed to tensions is not itself a uniquely pro-Russian position. Some academics and foreign policy analysts have argued similar points.

But Farage’s habit of consistently sounding softer on Putin than on Britain’s European allies has long alarmed critics.

Especially combined with his closeness to Trump, whose own Russia-related conduct has faced years of scrutiny.


The Billionaire Problem

Farage sells himself as anti-elite.

Yet wealthy donors seem to follow him around like seagulls after chips.

Recent reporting revealed Farage received a £5 million undeclared gift from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne before reversing his decision not to stand in the 2024 election.

Harborne has donated millions more to Reform-linked political causes over the years.

Questions naturally follow:

  • Why do ultra-wealthy individuals invest so heavily in supposedly anti-establishment populists?
  • What policies are they expecting in return?
  • Why do “ordinary working people” movements keep ending up financed by hedge-fund types, crypto billionaires and tax-averse elites?

Farage’s politics often sounds anti-elite.

His funding frequently does not.


The Eternal Outsider Routine

Perhaps the cleverest thing Farage ever achieved was convincing millions he was outside the system while making a living entirely from the system.

MEP salary.
Media contracts.
GB News.
Speaking tours.
Political donations.
Campaign companies.
Public appearances.
American conservative circuits.

All while portraying himself as the only man willing to “tell the truth”.

The reality is simpler:
Farage is extraordinarily good at branding.

He identifies public anger early.
He amplifies it.
He monetises it.
Then, when reality catches up, he pivots to the next grievance.

Brexit.
Immigration.
Net Zero.
The NHS.
Trump.
Culture wars.

Always outrage.
Always somebody else to blame.
Always another performance.


Gary’s Soapbox Comment

Farage’s real talent is not leadership. It’s salesmanship.

He sells frustration back to frustrated people while presenting himself as the bloke fighting “the elite”, despite spending years orbiting billionaires, media moguls and wealthy political donors.

The NHS comments matter because they expose the pattern. Say something extreme. Deny meaning exactly what everyone heard. Then accuse critics of twisting your words while quietly repeating the same argument in softer language later. That is straight out of the Donald Trump playbook. 

Any politician who fawns over Donald Trump the way Farage does is either a shill or standing at the end of somebody else’s puppet strings.

Britain already bought one Farage project on promises and slogans. The invoice is still arriving.


Wednesday, 11 June 2025

The Badass Craigslist Fiction Touted As Fact

 


When a Prank Becomes Propaganda

A bizarre Craigslist ad offering $6,500–$12,500 per week for "the toughest badasses in the city" recently went viral—and not for the reasons its creators intended. The ad, which called for individuals who "face danger head-on" and claimed they would be "activated when the situation demands it," was posted in the general labour section for Los Angeles and framed like a recruitment call for urban combat.

On the surface, it sounded like a secret paramilitary operation or the plot of a dystopian thriller. But it was neither.

The Reality: A Podcast Prank

Joey LaFleur, co-host of the prank show and podcast Goofcon1, later confirmed that the ad was part of a live stunt. In their third episode, he and his co-host Logan Quiroz called people who responded to the ad and laughed through the absurdity of it all. The show had no connection to political protests, riots, or organised unrest. The ad was posted on Thursday, before any immigration protest began in Los Angeles.

“I literally had no idea it was ever going to be connected to the riots. It was a really weird coincidence,” said Joey LaFleur, who posted the ad on Craigslist.

The ad was developed as part of a new prank show called Goofcon1, said LaFleur, who hosts the podcast with Logan Quiroz. On their show Friday, the day protests began, they spoke live on the phone with people who responded during Goofcon1’s third episode. LaFleur noted during the episode that he also posted a more “militaristic” version of the ad in Craigslist’s Austin section, but didn’t get many responses.

LaFleur himself later posted on Instagram: "Accidentally goofed the entire nation on the latest @goofcon1." In another post, he joked about ending up on Newsmax.

But what started as satire was quickly weaponised.

How It Was Repackaged as Fact

The Craigslist ad was picked up and posted as real by various Trump-aligned influencers, including news anchor Christina Aguayo. On her Facebook channel, under the branding Christina Aguayo News, she posted:

"Craigslist ADs paying people $6,500 to $12,500 per week to be 'tough bad*sses' in Los Angeles. This isn’t for everyone."

She gave no context that it was a joke or a prank. No fact-check. No update when the ad was debunked. And no acknowledgement that the post was feeding a dangerous misinformation cycle.

The Facts, Cross-Checked

  • Source: Joey LaFleur, Goofcon1 podcast

  • Purpose: Comedy and prank experiment

  • Timeline: Posted before LA protests began

  • Verification: Confirmed by the Associated Press and WRAL

  • Current status: Shared widely as disinformation among Trump supporters

Why This Matters

False claims about paid protesters have long been used to discredit legitimate political dissent. In 2020, similar stories were used to delegitimise Black Lives Matter protests. Now, in 2025, that tactic is resurfacing.

In this case, the prank ad is being cited by Trump supporters as evidence of an orchestrated leftist insurrection—fuel for Trump’s ongoing narrative of chaos and justification for bringing in federal troops.

Christina Aguayo: Bias and Misrepresentation

Christina Aguayo, a presenter affiliated with Salem News Channel, has a history of amplifying conservative talking points. Her Facebook feed contains largely pro-Trump messaging, often lacking source transparency or corrections.

By presenting the Craigslist ad without context and continuing to leave it up after its debunking, Aguayo effectively contributed to the spread of false information. She failed the basic journalistic responsibility to fact-check, update, or clarify.


Gary’s Soapbox Comment

This isn’t just sloppy journalism—it’s reckless. A prank ad, clearly meant for laughs, gets picked up and repackaged as evidence of a left-wing plot. Trump supporters are using this fiction to justify talk of military intervention. It nudges Trump closer to invoking the Insurrection Act—a power that’s already been floated far too casually. This is how democracies degrade: not with grand declarations, but with lies repeated often enough to feel true.

Strangely, the language in the ad—"badasses," "high-risk," "no room for hesitation"—reflects exactly the kind of tough-guy image Trump likes to project. Yet Trump, a man who dodged the draft and avoids conflict unless surrounded by loyalists, is more reminiscent of a school bully: loud with his gang behind him, but the bravado fades when he's alone. That this ad unintentionally mirrored his bluster and then got used to validate his narrative is either a surreal coincidence or a cautionary tale about how fast fiction becomes political weaponry. A prank ad, clearly meant for laughs, gets picked up and repackaged as evidence of a left-wing plot. Trump supporters are using this fiction to justify talk of military intervention. It nudges Trump closer to invoking the Insurrection Act—a power that’s already been floated far too casually. This is how democracies degrade: not with grand declarations, but with lies repeated often enough to feel true.


Thursday, 10 April 2025

AI Censored by Trump?


Isn't it strange that suddenly, ChatGBT can no longer produce images of Trump, nor can it create images which include things Trump has actually said. You can change it to something he didn't say, and that'll be OK.

That means statements like "Well, We Were Handed a Terrible Economy, as You Know" It's a fact that he said that word for word, although the statement is not a fact. But ChatGBT can no longer produce images with the truth in.

"I know what Im doing, and you know I know what I'm doing" can't be used either, as it's the truth he actually did say that. But now, anything with the truth in now has to be changed.

ChatGBT has now become a hub for Trump misinformation.

If it's censoring that, how can we know what we can trust from the information ChatGBT supplies? It calls into question every bit of data it provides to people.

Sunday, 22 March 2020

Covid-19 ~ To put things in a simplistic nutshell



  1. The government has totally messed up the Coronavirus response and I mean really messed up.
  2. They should have listened to WHO, and other countries that were way ahead of the UK in dealing with the virus, they didn't, they thought they knew better, they didn't.
  3. Not responding when they should have will cost a lot of lives, we could have been ahead of the game. We are now on the back foot.
  4. Cheltenham should never have gone ahead and will have been a catalyst for the explosion that is coming.
  5. All the lies and misinformation that Boris Johnson has spouted during Brexit has led to people not believing him when he needed them to. In essence, the chickens came home to roost.
  6. This is the long haul now don't go thinking that Pubs, clubs etc will be opening next month. This will be the end of the year or even next year and I have no idea how that will work.
  7. There are two things that might change this, a cheap and easy test for Coronavirus or a vaccine. Can't see a vaccine being available till next year. Maybe an existing drug can be modified?
  8. It's just like Flu - sorry no it's not do some proper research.  Coronavirus is twice as infectious as Flu.
  9. Flu kills more people - at present, yes and we have immunity built up over years and vaccines for flu we have nothing for Coronavirus. Flu kills 0.1% of patients Covid-19 is over 10 times higher.  If Coronavirus infected as many people as flu does the death rates would be 10 times higher.
  10. It only affects older people badly - Chinese study showed that there was 14.8% mortality among over 80s.  41% of serious cases occurred among under 50s and 27% over 65s.  You may be lucky if you get it and only have something mild or you may not its pot luck.
  11. I addition they knew we had a higher population density than most and it would, therefore, spread more quickly, another reason they should have reacted sooner.



LINKS

UPDATES
Graphic added 12/05/20

Thursday, 14 November 2019

The BBC's absolutely indefensible Bias against Jeremy Corbyn continues

Will Jeremy Corbyn's long march lead to power?
In 2009 at a Palestine Solidarity meeting he referred to “our friends from Hezbollah” and “our friends from Hamas”. His defence, when criticised, was similar to his stated reasons for meeting Irish republicans. He told Channel 4 News that “to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you profoundly disagree”.
Note the last part of that quote  “to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you profoundly disagree”

Picture 1 posted about 2am in morning
It's interesting that the image on this link was one that was obviously put up to make Corbyn look like a communist. See picture 1 above posted about 2am and picture 2 below, by 11:44 the image on the website had been changed).

I remember thinking well if that's not biased reporting from the BBC I dont know what is.

The absolute lies, misinformation and hypocrisy is literally beyond belief.

Picture 2 changed by 11:44 Am
This was run only a few days after the BBC had "Accidently" run a video of remembrance day from 2016 making BloJo look good and Corbyn look bad.

In reality it was BloJo that looked dishevelled, made several cock ups and laid the wreath upside down.  Still the media only had time to shout that Corbyn hadn't bowed enough.   Apparently there isn't a right or wrong way to lay a wreath, but I guarantee there would have been if Corbyn had put it the wrong way up.

One looks like hes been out at a nightclub all night and the other is Jeremy Corbyn.

BloJo Smarter on left in 2016 against on right looking like been pulled through a hedge backwards 2019

BBC apologises for using wrong Remembrance Sunday clip

Then whilst listening to Radio 5 live I heard the interviewer saying "but surely this is just going to let Corbyn into number 10" not Labour but Corbyn.  Any references on the other side were not made about Johnson but the Conservatives.

Absolutely indefensible Bias.

They have done exactly the same before in 2018 positioning Corbyn on a screen next to a picture of the Kremlin.

Apparently it was the curved screen, yeah right.

Did the BBC edit a photo of Jeremy Corbyn to make him look close to Russia?

BBC rejects complaints over Jeremy Corbyn's 'Russian' hat



LINKS
It’s not a conspiracy. Boris Johnson is just bad at laying wreaths and mopping floors



Saturday, 6 April 2019

The establishment is getting worried


Can always tell when the establishment is getting worried. The Tory media kicks in and it filters down.  The instances of lies and misinformation increase exponentially.

If they just posted facts id be happy to believe them but I would guess that as high as 90% of every negative thing about Corbyn is Bollox.

A fantasy of hysteria created by those who stand to lose control because Corbyn cant be bought. If he could we wouldn't be seeing all the vilification we do see from all angles.

The funny thing is most of the people spreading the false information, havnt checked it and would actually stand to gain from Corbyn getting in.

Divide and Rule.

The simple question to ask is, if Corbyn is really that bad...

Why do they need to lie and create misinformation? 

Surely the truth would be sufficient?

Tuesday, 17 April 2018

What actually happened in Douma


The information and misinformation continues and the truth becomes forever veiled under the lies being told by the major players. 

What is the truth? We will probably never know, however its easier to accept that a respected investigative journalist like Robert Fisk, who is actually on the ground in Douma, might be able to shed some light on what might have happened.

You can read his report here


"How could it be that Douma refugees who had reached camps in Turkey were already describing a gas attack which no-one in Douma today seemed to recall?"



LINKS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fisk
The search for truth in the rubble of Douma – and one doctor’s doubts over the chemical attack