Views on the world and things in it. I started writing the blog as a way of keeping track of information when fact checking things and to formulate my thoughts. It is still that, I'm no great writer.
Friday, 2 November 2018
Ken Dodd Jokes
What a lovely day for knocking on the Kremlin door and asking, is Len in?
"Ken Dodd died last night" _"Did he?"....."No Doddy"
“I used to think I was marvellous in bed until I discovered that all my girlfriends suffered from asthma.”
"I was in bed with my wife, she said "I could murder a bowl of cornflakes". Thats when I found out she was a cereal killer:"
'The man who invented cat’s eyes got the idea when he saw a cat facing him in the road. If the cat had been facing the other way, he’d have invented the pencil sharpener.
"Harold stood there with an arrow in his eye with one of his soldiers saying, keep blinking H, it'll work it's way out"
So it turns out that if you bang two halves of a horse together, it doesn’t make the sound of a coconut.’
"I just read a book about Stockholm Syndrome, it started off badly but by the end I really liked it."
What a beautiful day! What a beautiful day for sticking a cucumber through someone’s letter box and shouting: ‘Help, help, the Martians have landed.’
My Dad knew I was going to be a comedian. When I was a baby he said: ‘Is this a joke?’
My act is very educational. I heard a man leaving the other night, saying: 'Well, that taught me a lesson
How many men does it take to change a toilet roll? Nobody knows. It’s never been tried.
Men’s legs have a terribly lonely life – standing in the dark in your trousers all day.’
"It's ten years since I went out of my mind. I'd never go back."
"The trouble with Freud is that he never played the Glasgow Empire on a Saturday night after Rangers and Celtic had both lost."
"I've seen a topless lady ventriloquist. Nobody has ever seen her lips move."
"Do I believe in safe sex? Of course I do. I have a handrail around the bed."
"The French didn't object to British beef in 1940."
"Honolulu: it's got everything: sand for the children, sun for the wife, sharks for the wife's mother."
"Age doesn't matter, unless you are a cheese"
"Doctor, 'How old are you?' 'I'm approaching 50.' 'From which direction?"
"How do you make a blonde laugh on a Sunday? Tell her a joke on a Wednesday."
"Fifty-five years in show business, ladies and gentlemen. That's a hell of a long time to wait for a laugh."
"Tonight when you get home, put a handful of ice cubes down your wife's nightie and say: 'There's the chest freezer you always wanted'."
"An official went to ask my big Auntie Nellie to come off the beach because the tide was waiting to come in."
"I thought it would be a good idea to go into politics. Maybe I am a little old. but you know, I'd love to be Chancellor of the Exchequer. That way I'll be united with my money."
Did you hear about the shrimp that went to the prawn’s cocktail party? He pulled a mussel
We have a Frenchman that makes his own gravy — the Count of Monte Bisto.
I’ve done some brave things in my time. I played Nottingham Labour Club. I was the one who shouted: ‘Three cheers for Mrs Thatcher.’ And it was during the bingo.
In some parts of the world people eat little bent pieces of wire for breakfast — it’s their staple diet.
What is deja vu? Haven’t I already answered that?
Did you know that Les Miserables was a Frenchman with no sense of humour?
Did you know that Handel donated all his organs to medical science? Mind you, he wouldn’t let them have his piano.
I went into a shop last Saturday to buy a lottery ticket. And there was a gorgeous girl behind the counter. She said, ‘Next week it’ll be rollover week.’ I said, ‘Will it? That’s better than winning ten quid.’
I do gigs or ‘one night stands’. One night is all they can stand.
Eve said to Adam: ‘Do you love me?’ And he replied: ‘Well who else is there?’
I went outside the house and there was this man with his head sticking out the pavement. I said: ‘Are you from the gas board?’ He said: ‘No, my parachute didn’t open.’
The Millennium Dome: the world’s biggest wok . . . It looks like John Prescott lying down.
The Romans built our roads. They’re still working on the M6.
Over 285 bones in the human body, enough to last the average dog a fortnight.
Scientists and doctors — they’re making tremendous strides all the time. One of these days you could have another mouth on top of your head. When you’re late for work in the morning, stick a bacon sandwich under your cap and eat it on your way to the bus.
Dogs have a very very highly developed sense of smell. You wouldn’t think so from some of the things they sniff but they do.
As the Irishman said when he saw his X-ray: ‘I don’t remember eating all those bones.’
Aromatherapy’s all about different aromatic oils. Rosemary’s good for a headache. Well, she always had one when I tried it. Castor oil’s very good for athletics. Have a bottle of that and you don’t need starting blocks.
Blackpool: where everyone is so friendly. Even the tram drivers give you a cheery wave as they knock the legs from under you.
How does a hen know the size of an egg cup when it lays an egg?
I’ve never wronged an onion so why do they make me cry?
Our farmers, working hard to grow fresh British food. Better than that frozen stuff from Iceland.
How do you make a blonde’s eyes light up? Shine a torch in her earhole.
A blonde goes to the hairdresser on a Saturday morning and she has earphones on. She says to the hairdresser just go round them. So he tries but eventually he takes them off and bang, she falls unconscious onto the dressing table. He picks the earphones up and hears: ‘Breathe in. Breathe out.’
What’s black and blue and lies in the gutter? A comedian telling blonde jokes.
The crew here, they put me in number one dressing room. You can’t get lower than one. It was a nice dressing room though, they even put fresh straw in.
We don’t have bidets in my home. We just stand upside down in the shower.
There are some very dodgy questions on these forms. Sex? I put, ‘Well, occasionally’.
Nobody wanted me, my mother had to tie a pork chop round my neck to get the dog to play with me. When we played doctors and nurses, I was the ambulance driver.
Trouble, you don’t know what trouble is. This morning I rang up the Samaritans. I said: ‘Hello. My name’s Ken Dodd.’ The fella at the other end shot himself.
I’ve just seen a car wearing a Red Nose . . . And an Irishman breathalysing it.
A laugh is a noise that comes out of your face — anywhere else and you’re in big trouble.
Do you like science fiction, sir?
Well you look like you’ve just landed.
There was Smeaton, who invented the Eddystone lighthouse. The first man to have a quick flash in public and get away with it.
What a beautiful day for dashing out to Trafalgar Square, chucking a bucket of whitewash over the pigeons and saying, ‘There you are, how do you like it?’
I can kiss a girl and nibble her ear at the same time.
On Wednesday I got six numbers in a row. It was on the gas bill but that’s a start.
I was going to take the dog to an obedience class but it wouldn’t go.
On Friday morning there was a tap on the door. He’s got a funny sense of humour that plumber.
I think all newspapers should have a happiness page… On a Monday morning you could start the week with a laugh. You could see the headline: ‘Inland Revenue officials swallowed by boa constrictor’.
The Pennines are the backbone of England. So what does that leave London?
I don’t do much television these days Why? Because I can’t cook.
Where’s a chicken’s nuggets?
A few years ago I used to be a sexagenarian. I loved it. I used to do home visits.
Always be nice to your kids because they’re the ones who’ll decide which home you’re going in.
A little old lady went to the doctor and said: ‘Can I have some more sleeping pills for my husband?’
He said: ‘Why?’ She said: ‘He woke up.’
I do a lot of satire. That’s why I have this big stool.
I come from a very old military family. My great-grandfather had a lot to do with the relief of Ladysmith. As a matter of fact she invited him back the following night.
In Germany all the hims are Herrs.
Here they have a Butlins-trained chef. He’s what they call a ‘cordon-bluergh’.
Hello Mrs. Is this your husband with you or is it novelty night?
It’s a posh audience here tonight. There are people in the front row eating chips with their gloves on.
According to council regulations, this room can be cleared in three minutes. I’m here to prove it.
We have one enemy tonight, Ladies and Gentlemen. Time. And I’m going to fight it.
It’s a long show here tonight. If you look under your seats you’ll find a will form.
I’m a sex symbol for women who don’t care.
Monday morning, I woke up and there was this beautiful blonde suntanned girl lying alongside me. I said: ‘Have you been here all night?’ she said: ‘Shut up and finish your dream.’
The vicar said to me last Sunday: ‘Kenneth, isn’t it wonderful to see the young people walking down the road carrying the good book?’ I said, ‘They’re taking their videos back.’
People say: ‘How long does you tour last?’ I say: ‘What time can you be here?’
How am I coping with the credit crunch? I thought it was a chocolate bar.
For a man of 103, I feel marvellous.
I stand here today full of Bulldog spirit and with teeth to match.
This morning the BBC sent a car for me. Luckily it missed.
Have you ever been in a Jacuzzi? With the water swirling away? You don’t know whether to enjoy it or apologise.
No wonder those French folks are so frisky — have you seen those long loaves they eat?
Five out of every three people have trouble understanding fractions.
Tonight we’re going to be asking mind-boggling questions. Like ‘where do flies go in the wintertime?’ And ‘what are the tailors going to do about it?’
They say an elephant never forgets. But I’ve never had a birthday card from one of them.
Votes for women! Squirting a hosepipe up Emmeline Pankhurst! How’s that for a suffering jet!
In the club I was in last night in Scunthorpe they kept a pig on the counter as an air freshener.
Euphemisms. These are words people use to cover up. For instance, ‘a molecular reaction has restructured an urban environment in a new concept’. That means ‘an atom bomb has just dropped on Wigan’.
I was a very small child. My mother used to carry me around in a handbag. I thought her ballpoint pen was my brother.
What’s green, eight-foot long, has great legs and, if it fell out of a tree, would kill you? A snooker table.
What’s red and hard and bad for your teeth? A brick.
What do you call a lady with one leg longer than the other? Eileen.
A big ship ran aground in Abbeyview harbour. It was a big ship loaded with a cargo of red and blue paint. All the crew were marooned.
It’s very nice to be here. But at my age, it is very nice to be anywhere.
Wednesday, 12 September 2018
Sovereign RIP 18.04.2010 – 12.09.2018
Sovereign RIP 18.04.2010 – 12.09.2018
Unfortunately we had to help our horse Sovereign across the rainbow bridge tonight. He was a feisty chap and would have gone crazy with the months of box rest and operations needed to possibly repair him from a stifle injury.
With a year minimum of recovery time and no definite answers whether the outcome would be positive. We had to make a difficult decision after he was discovered in a field on the floor and struggling to get up, he was obviously in pain.
Happier times
We gave him lots of treats and Devils claw and Marigolds
My daughter, Sabrina had some special quiet time with him
The herd horses all came over and stood in line to say goodbye (how do they know?)
He let Sabrina know when it was time and he calmly walked over.
and went to sleep
Run Free Sovereign!
"I stood beside your bed last night, I came to have a peep.
I could see that you were crying; you found it hard to sleep.
I whinnied to you softly as you brushed away a tear,
"It's me, I haven't left you. I'm well, I'm fine, I'm here."
I was with you at my grave today; you tend it with such care.
I want to reassure you, that I'm not lying there.
I walked with you toward the house, as you fumbled for your key.
I put my head against you, nickered and said, "It's me."
You looked so very tired, and sank into a chair.
I tried so hard to let you know that I was standing there.
It's possible for me to be so near you every day.
To say to you with certainty, "I never went away."
You sat there very quietly, then smiled; I think you knew.
In the stillness of that evening, I was very close to you.
And when the time is right for you to cross the brief divide,
I'll gallop across to greet you, and we'll stand there side by side.
I have so many things to show you, there's so much for you to see.
Be patient, live your journey out...then come home to be with me."
Thursday, 6 September 2018
Russian? Novichok assassins wanted to be seen.
So the story is, these two are highly trained Russian intelligence operatives, (well one would have thought that they would be highly trained).
They landed at Gatwick and then took the train system to Waterloo and onto Salisbury in doing so these highly trained operatives chose the route with the most CCTV cameras. Almost as if they wanted to be seen. They didnt do this once but twice, so 4 trips on the train system.
Scotland yard released pictures of the pair going through the airport
Ruslan Boshirov goes through at 16:22:43
Alexander Petrov goes through at 16:22:43
So from those pictures it looks like they both went through same corridor and were in exactly the same space at exactly the same time to the second. Even if the corridors are different ones that look the same, they both passed the same point at the same time to the second.
Im not sure if thats spooky or if there is some other explanation?
My questions are.
- Why would 'highly trained russian intelligence operatives choose a route with the most CCTV on it?
- Why wouldnt you go there by hire car and back by train to confuse things? or make the trip there and back by car or motorbike avoiding the majority of CCTV.
- How did two people manage to walk down the same corridor with neither in sight of the other and be in exactly the same space at excatly the same time to the second?
- If its not the same corridor how did they manage to be in the same spot, in different corridors at exactly the same time to the second.
- Why stand in full view of CCTV camera that they would obviously be aware of? There are many other pictures of them on CCTV.
LINKS
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/09/the-impossible-photo
http://news.met.police.uk/news/counter-terrorism-police-release-images-of-two-suspects-in-connection-with-salisbury-attack-320534
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45429894
Sunday, 26 August 2018
Epilepsy in dogs
These are side effects of Phenobarbital
Phenobarbital may result in these side effects:
Anxiety.
Lethargy.
Sedation.
Increase in water intake.
Increase in appetite.
Increase in urination.
Anemia.
Weight gain.
Ataxia
Ataxia is when a dog loses coordination in his hind end or experiences weakness there. Phenobarbital can trigger ataxia, and if you notice this, you should let your vet know.
Most of these side effects diminish or disappear after the first few weeks of therapy. Excessive urination, excessive thirst and excessive hunger are the most common long-term side effects.
Chronic or long term use (over 3 months) of Phenobarbital can lead to scarring in the liver and liver failure in a small percentage of dogs
To determine the correct dose of Phenobarbital, it can be very helpful to monitor its level in the blood. Your veterinarian will want to test Phenobarbital levels after approximately two weeks of therapy to be sure that your dog is in a therapeutic range. It takes two weeks for Phenobarbital to reach a steady state after starting or adjusting Phenobarbital.
POTASSIUM BROMIDE AS AN ADD ON DRUG TO PHENOBARBITAL
Phenobarbital is what many veterinarians choose first when an anti-seizure drug is indicated for a dog. Phenobarbital has been successfully used in dogs for decades and has always been considered a relatively safe drug. Only recently has it been recognized that 20% of the dogs on Pb therapy develop liver dysfunction which can result in death if not properly treated. As a result, KBr is now becoming the first drug of choice for veterinarians. KBr and Pb are often used together to achieve control with dogs whose seizures are not well controlled by phenobarbital alone.
The use of potassium bromide appears to be relatively safe in dogs even when used over months or years and monitored correctly. Unlike PB, which is processed through the liver, KBr is broken down through the kidneys and does not have any known liver toxicity.
LINKS
http://www.canineepilepsy.co.uk/living-with-epileptic-pets.html
https://canna-pet.com/side-effects-phenobarbital-dogs
https://www.fitzpatrickreferrals.co.uk/neurology/epilepsy
http://www.canineepilepsy.co.uk
http://www.canine-epilepsy-guardian-angels.com/PbandLiver.htm
http://www.canine-epilepsy-guardian-angels.com/phenobarbital.htm
https://www.petforums.co.uk/threads/some-advice-needed-for-epileptic-archie.337028
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenobarbital
https://www.weldricks.co.uk/products/phenobarbital-15mg-1-tablet
https://www.vetuk.co.uk/pet-meds-prescription-only-epiphen-c-21_726
Phenobarbital may result in these side effects:
Anxiety.
Lethargy.
Sedation.
Increase in water intake.
Increase in appetite.
Increase in urination.
Anemia.
Weight gain.
Ataxia
Ataxia is when a dog loses coordination in his hind end or experiences weakness there. Phenobarbital can trigger ataxia, and if you notice this, you should let your vet know.
Causes of Cerebellar Ataxia in Dogs and Cats. In both humans and animals, the cerebellum is the area of the brain that controls coordination and movement. When this area is damaged, it can result in a loss of coordination, balance, and motor function control. It can also sometimes cause cognitive impairment.
Most of these side effects diminish or disappear after the first few weeks of therapy. Excessive urination, excessive thirst and excessive hunger are the most common long-term side effects.
Chronic or long term use (over 3 months) of Phenobarbital can lead to scarring in the liver and liver failure in a small percentage of dogs
To determine the correct dose of Phenobarbital, it can be very helpful to monitor its level in the blood. Your veterinarian will want to test Phenobarbital levels after approximately two weeks of therapy to be sure that your dog is in a therapeutic range. It takes two weeks for Phenobarbital to reach a steady state after starting or adjusting Phenobarbital.
Seizures are not uncommon in dogs, but many dogs have only a single seizure.
What is the prognosis of Epilepsy?
The prognosis for epilepsy is typically good although it is largely dependent on the number of seizures an animal suffers.
POTASSIUM BROMIDE AS AN ADD ON DRUG TO PHENOBARBITAL
Phenobarbital is what many veterinarians choose first when an anti-seizure drug is indicated for a dog. Phenobarbital has been successfully used in dogs for decades and has always been considered a relatively safe drug. Only recently has it been recognized that 20% of the dogs on Pb therapy develop liver dysfunction which can result in death if not properly treated. As a result, KBr is now becoming the first drug of choice for veterinarians. KBr and Pb are often used together to achieve control with dogs whose seizures are not well controlled by phenobarbital alone.
The use of potassium bromide appears to be relatively safe in dogs even when used over months or years and monitored correctly. Unlike PB, which is processed through the liver, KBr is broken down through the kidneys and does not have any known liver toxicity.
LINKS
http://www.canineepilepsy.co.uk/living-with-epileptic-pets.html
https://canna-pet.com/side-effects-phenobarbital-dogs
https://www.fitzpatrickreferrals.co.uk/neurology/epilepsy
http://www.canineepilepsy.co.uk
http://www.canine-epilepsy-guardian-angels.com/PbandLiver.htm
http://www.canine-epilepsy-guardian-angels.com/phenobarbital.htm
https://www.petforums.co.uk/threads/some-advice-needed-for-epileptic-archie.337028
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenobarbital
https://www.weldricks.co.uk/products/phenobarbital-15mg-1-tablet
https://www.vetuk.co.uk/pet-meds-prescription-only-epiphen-c-21_726
The bacon sandwich myth
Pictures of bacon sandwiches are offensive to Muslims.
Er .... Someone didn't do their homework on this one
It really is time certain people educated themselves to stop all of us non-muslim, non-religious people being made to look stupid.
Most Muslims find No 1 humorous because a bacon sandwich isn't insulting, it isn't offensive. They dont eat pork through choice, because their religious book says not to.
Here's the offending passage in the Quran....
“Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah.”[Al-Qur’an 5:3]
Strangely enough the Bible also prohibits the consumption of pork, so all you Christians are going to burn in hell as well.
The book of Leviticus....
“And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be cloven footed, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you”.
“Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcass shall ye not touch, they are unclean to you.”
[Leviticus 11:7-8]
The book of Deuteronomy
“And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you. Ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcass.”
[Deuteronomy 14:8]
The book of Isaiah
All day long I have held out my hands to an obstinate people, who walk in ways not good, pursuing their own imaginations— a people who continually provoke me to my very face, offering sacrifices in gardens and burning incense on altars of brick; who sit among the graves and spend their nights keeping secret vigil; who eat the flesh of pigs, and whose pots hold broth of unclean meat; who say, ‘Keep away; don’t come near me, for I am too sacred for you!’ Such people are smoke in my nostrils, a fire that keeps burning all day
Isaiah 65:2-5
Soapbox Comment
Please stop posting bollox and focus on real issues.LINKS
https://www.whyislam.org/faqs/restrictions-in-islam/why-do-muslims-abstain-from-pork
https://hshidayat.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/why-we-are-prohibited-to-eat-swine-pork
http://www.bcbsr.com/books/ism65_2.html
https://www.bible.com/bible/546/lev.11.7-8.kjva
https://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/5299/eVerseID/5299
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bacon-sandwich-reported-offensive-facebook
https://www.indy100.com/article/bacon-muslims-ramadan-twitter-edl-britain-first-white-supremacists-7762736
https://stepfeed.com/a-guy-tried-to-offend-muslims-with-a-photo-of-bacon-their-response-is-epic-1175
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bacon-sandwich-reported-offensive-facebook/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/general-pershing-stop-islamic-terrorists
https://www.truthorfiction.com/plant-a-pig
Tuesday, 24 July 2018
Has Trump increased Jobs
Lots of claims from Trump himself and various memes circulating the Internet about employment and as its one of his biggest claims I thought Id check it out.
Trump was inaugurated on December 19, 2016 so hes been in office for 1 year, 7 months and 5 days.
Obama was inaugurated on January 20, 2009
While addressing the General Assembly on Sept. 19, 2017 Trump claimed the following.
"Unemployment is at its lowest level in 16 years, and because of our regulatory and other reforms, we have more people working in the United States today than ever before."
Lets just have a look at the jobs claim because I maintain that noone can influence jobs that much in such a big country in just 19 months.
The statement itself if a bit confusing because if you have low unemployment it stands to reason you have more people working. But anyway, here are the official figures......
So its easy to see from the above official charts that both parts of the statement are not true.
Trump claim: "Unemployment is at its lowest level in 16 years" - NOT TRUE
Trump claim: "we have more people working in the United States today than ever before." - NOT TRUE
Its as simple as that.
LINKS
FACT CHECK: President Trump's Record On Jobs And Stocks
Trump Created More Jobs Than Previously Reported. So Did Obama
How strong has job growth been on Donald Trump's watch?
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
Monday, 23 July 2018
Scammer or not a Scammer on Feabie
The question arose is it illegal to get money out of people on a Site called Feabie or any other site, using a fake profile. One would think that the answer was obvious but maybe not. Feabie is a weird site anyway but wont go into that ....
Ive done a lot of thinking and a lot of searching. The answer has to be.... whilst creating a fake profile is not illegal, it does break the rules of the site and getting money out of someone whilst perporting to be someone else could lead to being prosecuted for fraud. Its as simple as that.
Lets look at a point by point summary and all four in this context are illegal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monzo_(bank)
https://www.feabie.com/Home/FAQ
http://www.fasterpayments.org.uk/consumers/sort-code-checker
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=AC%20Money
https://www.howtochatonline.net/facebook/illegal-to-create-fake-facebook-account-uk/
https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/types-of-scams/dating-romance
https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/news/the-top-8-frauds-to-watch-out-for-in-2018
https://www.scamnet.wa.gov.au/scamnet/Scam_prevention-Spot_social_media_scams.htm
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/1754916/catfishing-meaning-identity-steal-online-dating
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39078201
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/catfish-catfishing-dating-websites-fake-dating-profiles-sex-online-predators-mtv-legal-illegal-law-a7846011.html
https://www.pnld.co.uk/media/56459/alisdair-gillespie-pnld-2017.pdf
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/social-media-guidelines-prosecuting-cases-involving-communications-sent-social-media
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/scams/reporting-a-scam
https://www.reddit.com/r/Stuffers/comments/46xm7z/fuck_feabie_guys
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/social-media-guidelines-prosecuting-cases-involving-communications-sent-social-media
Ive done a lot of thinking and a lot of searching. The answer has to be.... whilst creating a fake profile is not illegal, it does break the rules of the site and getting money out of someone whilst perporting to be someone else could lead to being prosecuted for fraud. Its as simple as that.
Lets look at a point by point summary and all four in this context are illegal.
- Is money laundering illegal ~ YES
- Is scamming people illegal ~ YES
- Is catfishing illegal ~ NO ~ Currently not illegal in the UK but.... If a victim hands over money, the "catfish" could be prosecuted for fraud; so in this case its illegal.
- Is creating a fake profile on Feabie illegal ~ Not illegal but it is against the rules of the site and if used for getting money out of victims then could be prosecuted for fraud. So again as being used for monetary gain its illegal.
- Breaking the rules of the Feabie site
- Scamming ~ illegal
- Fraudulent ~ illegal
- Deceitful
- Immoral
- Dishonest
- Unscrupulous
- Devious
Fake photos: Members
are not allowed to post photos of other people (or illustrations drawn
by other people) as if they were their own. Full stop.
False identity: This
should be obvious, but members are not allowed to assume fake
identities, including posting intentionally misleading profile
information, engaging in catfishing activities, or misrepresenting their
gender identity in order to get additional network features.
Catfishing ~ The practise is deceitful, but it is not illegal – despite victims complaining of mental harm.
Catfishing ~ may not be a criminal act, but it depends on whether the catfish had any intention to cause a (monetary) gain or loss. - If they did, then it is likely that the criminal law could intervene.
If there is any financial gain or loss incurred as a consequence of the false account or profile, an offence may also be committed under the Fraud Act 2006: under section 8 possession or making or supplying 'articles' for use in frauds includes any program or data held in electronic form. For further guidance prosecutors should refer to the legal guidance on the Fraud Act 2006, in particular that relating to ss6-8 of the Act.
“Catfish” Scams ~ A “catfish” is someone who creates a fake social media account in order to pursue an online romance. Sometimes, catfish convince their victims to send money or gifts, or to pay for their travel or other expenses.
What is Confidence fraud ~ These are frauds where the perpetrator wins the confidence of the victim and obtains money or other property by deception. These include advance fee frauds, so called ‘419 scams’, foreign lottery scams and bogus charity scams. In short, they usually include any kind of fraud where someone is conned out of money or other assets. A common factor in many of these frauds is the targeting of vulnerable victims. Also, they will often be multiple frauds, i.e. many victims are deceived in the same way.
These offences are usually charged under the Fraud Act (section 1), where the maximum sentence permitted by law is 10 years imprisonment. For allegations of false accounting under the Theft Act 1968, 7 years is the maximum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monzo_(bank)
https://www.feabie.com/Home/FAQ
http://www.fasterpayments.org.uk/consumers/sort-code-checker
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=AC%20Money
https://www.howtochatonline.net/facebook/illegal-to-create-fake-facebook-account-uk/
https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/types-of-scams/dating-romance
https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/news/the-top-8-frauds-to-watch-out-for-in-2018
https://www.scamnet.wa.gov.au/scamnet/Scam_prevention-Spot_social_media_scams.htm
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/1754916/catfishing-meaning-identity-steal-online-dating
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39078201
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/catfish-catfishing-dating-websites-fake-dating-profiles-sex-online-predators-mtv-legal-illegal-law-a7846011.html
https://www.pnld.co.uk/media/56459/alisdair-gillespie-pnld-2017.pdf
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/social-media-guidelines-prosecuting-cases-involving-communications-sent-social-media
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/scams/reporting-a-scam
https://www.reddit.com/r/Stuffers/comments/46xm7z/fuck_feabie_guys
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/social-media-guidelines-prosecuting-cases-involving-communications-sent-social-media
Monday, 16 July 2018
Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit
Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit.
So whats this about then?
The President of the USA doesn't trust his own intelligence services. So what are we supposed to do with that information, why should we trust them if he doesnt? But hang on maybe we should look outside the box. Doesn't Trump have interests in Russia? lets have a look.
So according to Wikipedia (probably not the most accurate place to get info but...)
Donald Trump has pursued business deals in Russia since 1987, and has sometimes traveled there to explore potential business opportunities. In 1996, Trump trademark applications were submitted for potential Russian real estate development deals. Trump's partners and children have repeatedly visited Moscow, connecting with developers and government officials to explore joint venture opportunities. Trump was never able to successfully conclude any real estate deals in Russia. However, individual Russians have invested heavily in Trump properties, and following Trump's bankruptcies in the 1990's he borrowed money from Russian sources. In 2008 his son Donald Trump Jr. said that Russia was an important source of money for the Trump businesses.By the way isn't it interesting how certain people try to claim that Corbyn is a commie (they probably need to check the difference between Socialist and communist) and those same people think Trump is the next best thing to sliced bread but Trump is the one cuddling up to the dreaded Russians. But i digress.
Actually this Wikipedia information gets more interesting and the trouble is... it all kinda fits or am I creating a jigsaw to fit my puzzle? Look at this little snippet.
In 1987, Trump visited Russia to investigate developing a hotel, invited by Ambassador Yuri Dubinin whom he had met in New York the year before.[3] British journalist Luke Harding alleged in 2017 that this trip likely began a long-term cultivation operation typical of the KGB's Political Intelligence Department, under written directives initiated by First Chief Directorate head Vladimir Kryuchkov, to recruit politically ambitious Westerners susceptible to flattery, egotism and greed.[3]So "susceptible to flattery, egotism and greed" I think even the most ardent Trump supporter would have problems trying to disagree that Trump likes flattery, has an ego and greed well are rich people greedy? open for debate I guess. Or is it? these start up CEO's made their staff millionaires are they greedy in comparison? Makes you think.
Still, Trump’s business ties to Russia are striking nonetheless. Even without access to his tax returns or venturing into conjecture about hidden business interests, it’s clear that Trump has an affinity for doing deals with Russians. Furthermore, it’s clear that his affinity for doing business with them is intertwined with how he perceives them politically; as Franklin Foer points out in Slate, Trump’s public affection for Vladimir Putin corresponds with his dependence on Russian investors.And
It’s difficult to say if his praise was intended to make it easier for him to gain access to the Russian market, or if it simply arose out a sincere appreciation for Russia’s authoritarian political culture as he began to understand it more — or some combination of the two. But in either case it’s clear that Trump’s attempts at making deals in Russia have gone beyond business.
Donald Trump is like the Kremlin’s favored candidates, only more so. He celebrated the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU. He denounces NATO with feeling. He is also a great admirer of Vladimir Putin. Trump’s devotion to the Russian president has been portrayed as buffoonish enthusiasm for a fellow macho strongman. But Trump’s statements of praise amount to something closer to slavish devotion. In 2007, he praised Putin for “rebuilding Russia.” A year later he added, “He does his work well. Much better than our Bush.” When Putin ripped American exceptionalism in a New York Times op-ed in 2013, Trump called it “a masterpiece.” Despite ample evidence, Trump denies that Putin has assassinated his opponents, “In all fairness to Putin, you’re saying he killed people. I haven’t seen that.” In the event that such killings have transpired, they can be forgiven: “At least he’s a leader.” And not just any old head of state: “I will tell you that, in terms of leadership, he’s getting an A.”Protesteth too much?
Hmmmm well someone is wrong...
'Nobody's been stronger on Putin than Trump'Wouldn't be the 1st time a few expendable assets were sacrificed to protect a bigger asset.....oops did I say that out loud.
Former secret service agent Dan Bongino has said on Fox News that "nobody's been stronger on Putin than Trump".
Mr Bongino was talking with reference to the death of Russian mercenaries in Syria, saying the American military "had the Russians scrambling".
"I don't think Putin expected Trump to respond that way," he said.
"That was not an insignificant incident over there."
He also said Mr Trump's comments about Russian gas pipelines was another example of the US president confronting the Russians.
Before leaving the last word to Jonathan Marcus, BBC diplomatic correspondent ill say one thing... Corbyn suffered 2 years of media assassination which continues and a similar weight is thrown against Trump. The trouble is when you checked Corbyn you found that it was indeed that misinformation and lies. With Trump most claims lead to evidence and Trump doesn't help himself by spreading misinformation almost every time he talks, which is so easy to check.
Trump targets opponents back home Analysis by Jonathan Marcus, BBC diplomatic correspondent
Before their encounter started Mr Putin was already winning on points, by the mere fact that President Trump was meeting him in the first place.
But while Mr Putin came over as the seasoned professional, eager to present his country as an equivalent to the US in terms of being a nuclear superpower; an energy provider; and a key actor in the Middle East, Mr Trump seemed more intent on castigating his opponents back home.
A lot of the questions focused on Russia's intrusion into the US election campaign (the considered position of the key US intelligence agencies) and specifically the indictment by the Mueller probe of 12 Russian intelligence agents.
Mr Trump would have none of it. He visibly seemed happier with Mr Putin's assurances than he did with the evidence of his own intelligence agencies. And he even welcomed Mr Putin's suggestion that Russia could join the investigation and interview the alleged perpetrators itself! Washington's Nato allies and many seasoned observers on Capitol Hill must have been watching in horror.
As always I'm always willing to be proved wrong. Post away.
LINKS
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/russia-paid-donald-trump-millions-of-dollars
Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_projects_of_Donald_Trump_in_Russia
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/mind-over-money/201003/rich-people-are-greedy
How 3 Startup CEOs Gave Up Fortunes To Turn Half Their Employees Into Millionaires
Why the Rich Are Less Ethical: They See Greed as Good
Finally, A Billionaire Defends The Billions That She Earned
Fact-checking Trump's claim that he has no business ties to Russia
Vladimir Putin has a plan for destroying the West—and that plan looks a lot like Donald Trump.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/819159806489591809
As it happened - Trump and Putin's landmark meeting
Friday, 13 July 2018
Its an insult to put Trump in the same sentence
Personally I think its an insult to those that died to put Trump in the same sentence.
You earn respect it doesn't get handed to you by position or the amount of money you have.
All those troops that died earned our eternal respect.
As yet Trump has not.
All those troops that died earned our eternal respect.
As yet Trump has not.
USA military deaths WWI = 116,108
UK military deaths WWI = 800,000
USA military deaths WWII = 407,300
UK military deaths WWII = 383,700
Total USA military deaths WWI & WWII = 523,408
Total UK military deaths WWI & WWII = 1,183700
LINKS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties
Wednesday, 11 July 2018
Epilepsy in dogs
Our dog has started having fits which are focal seizures at present lasting no more than 30-40 seconds.
At present hes only had 2 that we know of and there are a myriad of possible causes including head trauma, liver and/ or kidney disease. So hes booked in for blood test of Friday.
Its worth noting that 2 drugs our dog is taking for pain relief are on a suspect list of drugs causing seizures tramadol and gabapentin, according to one website. Conversly gabapentin is used to treat seizures, Hmmm. Tramadol is listed as having seizures as possible side effect
Focal seizures
These only occur in one half of the brain and within a particular region. How these types of seizures present themselves depends upon where in the brain the abnormal electrical activity started, and the function of that part of the brain. Focal epileptic seizures can present as:
- Episodic movements ("Motor" signs) e.g. facial twitches, rhythmic blinking, head shaking or repeated muscle contractions of one extremity
- Autonomic signs (arising from the autonomic nervous system) e.g. excessive salivation, vomiting, dilated pupils
- Behavioural signs (episodic changes in the dogs behaviour) e.g. restlessness, anxiety, attention seeking, unexplainable fear behaviour
What can trigger my dog's epilepsy?
Some dogs may appear to have 'triggers' that lead to a seizure, while others do not. Identifiable triggers may differ from dog to dog. In people with epilepsy, common triggers include tiredness and lack of sleep, stress, and not taking medication. Stress is a trigger commonly reported by owners, and may be caused by a variety of situations including changes in the environment, changes in routine, car rides, thunderstorms, and visits to the vets to name a few. Other owners report certain foods or medications seem to trigger seizures in their dog. Keeping a seizure diary may help identify triggers in your dog.
Is a seizure painful or dangerous to the dog?
"Dog may feel confusion and perhaps panic."Despite the dramatic and violent appearance of a seizure, seizures are not painful, although the dog may feel confusion and perhaps panic. Contrary to popular belief, dogs do not swallow their tongues during a seizure. If you put your fingers or an object into its mouth, you will not help your pet and you run a high risk of being bitten very badly or of injuring your dog. The important thing is to keep the dog from falling or hurting itself by knocking objects onto itself. As long as it is on the floor or ground, there is little chance of harm occurring.
A single seizure is rarely dangerous to the dog. However, if the dog has multiple seizures within a short period of time (cluster seizures), or if a seizure continues for longer than a few minutes, the body temperature begins to rise. If hypothermia or an elevated body temperature develops secondary to a seizure, another set of problems may have to be addressed.
Possible Triggers (to qualify as a trigger, it has to have happened within 30 hours of your dog’s seizure, except after vaccination)
- Lawn treatments and fertilisers
- Herbicides and insecticides
- Cedar shavings
- Many flowers and plants are poisonous to dogs, which can also cause a seizure. The ASPCA has provided a list of plants that are toxic to dogs.
- Barometric pressure changes and extreme heat or cold are thought to be potential triggers.
- Bee and wasp venom and toad poisoning
- Photo sensitivity, Photo sensitivity refers to flashing or bright lights.
- Scented candles
- Perfume
- Loud music
- Cigarette smoke
- Pine Sol or any other cleaners with pine oil,
- Kerosene
- Camphor
- Eucalyptus
- Borax or boric acid
- Deck and wall stains,
- Polyurethane fumes,
- Paint fumes and Swiffer chemicals.
- A diet too high in sodium
- Processed, low grade dog foods.
- Fruits, including tomatoes and carrots, can actually trigger a seizure in some dogs
- Certain dairy products, like cheese (particularly if it is mouldy), cottage cheese and milk are also danger foods.
- Unclean or uncooked pork products can be problematic as well as turkey
- Rosemary, sage, fennel and saffron
- Walnuts are generally thought of as harmful to dogs, and caffeine can also be a trigger
- Foods or treats with ethoxyquin, BHA or BHT of foods with MSG can also be potential triggers. MSG is often referred to in food products as “natural flavoring” or “smoke flavouring,” etc.
- Uncleansed rawhide treats and pig’s ear or feet, Several commercially produced dog chews are bleached. Flavoured chews will often have some chemical additives listed above.
- A dog’s medications can sometimes trigger seizures as well. These include vaccinations, heartworm medications, flea and tick preventative medications and some other prescription medications.
- The lights of a television, Christmas lights, or even lightning can trigger a seizure.
- Changes in barometric pressure and extreme hot or cold weather
- Thunderstorms also can spook a dog enough to be a trigger.
- Sudden changes to your dog’s diet or routine can also cause stress that may trigger a seizure. Dogs run on a very strict internal clock, and know when it is time to eat or go outside or when you get home from work. Changes in their routine can be caused by visiting friends or family members, a new baby joining the family, construction around the home and more.
- Missing, skipping, or going too long in between meals can also cause low blood sugar, which can be a trigger of seizures as well.
- Being left alone for too long can cause a dog a great deal of stress and can trigger a seizure.
- On the flip side, a prolonged period of activity and excitement can also trigger a seizure.
- Another stress trigger to avoid is loud arguments or angry voices. When people fight around a dog, the dog will often think that the people are angry at them. This is actually the worst kind of stress for a dog. Other causes of emotional stress to dogs include long car rides, visits to your vet, general nervousness, and anxiety.
LINKS
https://canna-pet.com/triggers-seizures-dogs
https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/health/for-owners/epilepsy
https://www.rvc.ac.uk/news-and-events/rvc-news/rvc-pet-epilepsy-tracker-app
https://www.cesarsway.com/dog-care/health-and-care-issues/how-to-recognize-and-handle-dog-seizures
https://www.bluecross.org.uk/pet-advice/canine-epilepsy-and-seizures-dogs
https://www.petmd.com/dog/conditions/neurological/c_dg_seizures_convulsions
https://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/3-natural-treatments-for-dog-seizures-and-epilepsy
https://pethelpful.com/dogs/Warning-signs-of-neurological-disorders-in-canines
http://dogtime.com/dog-health/53089-gabapentin-dogs-uses-dosage-side-effects
http://dogtime.com/dog-health/59541-tramadol-dogs-uses-dosage-side-effects
Monday, 9 July 2018
Boris Johnson's resignation letter and Mays reply
Boris Johnson's resignation letter
Dear Theresa
It is more than two years since the British people voted to leave the European Union on an unambiguous and categorical promise that if they did so they would be taking back control of their democracy.
They were told that they would be able to manage their own immigration policy, repatriate the sums of UK cash currently spent by the EU, and, above all, that they would be able to pass laws independently and in the interests of the people of this country.
Brexit should be about opportunity and hope. It should be a chance to do things differently, to be more nimble and dynamic, and to maximise the particular advantages of the UK as an open, outward-looking global economy.
That dream is dying, suffocated by needless self-doubt.
We have postponed crucial decisions – including the preparations for no deal, as I argued in my letter to you of last November – with the result that we appear to be heading for a semi-Brexit, with large parts of the economy still locked in the EU system, but with no UK control over that system.
It now seems that the opening bid of our negotiations involves accepting that we are not actually going to be able to make our own laws. Indeed we seem to have gone backwards since the last Chequers meeting in February, when I described my frustrations, as Mayor of London, in trying to protect cyclists from juggernauts. We had wanted to lower the cabin windows to improve visibility; and even though such designs were already on the market, and even though there had been a horrific spate of deaths, mainly of female cyclists, we were told that we had to wait for the EU to legislate on the matter.
So at the previous Chequers session, we thrashed out an elaborate procedure for divergence from EU rules. But even that seems to have been taken of the table and there is in fact no easy UK right of initiative. Yet if Brexit is to mean anything, it must surely give ministers and Parliament the chance to do things differently to protect the public. If a country cannot pass a law to save the lives of female cyclists – when that proposal is supported at every level of UK Government – then I don't see how that country can truly be called independent.
It is also also clear that by surrendering control over our rulebook for goods and agrifoods (and much else besides) we will make it much more difficult to do free trade deals. And then there is the further impediment of having to argue for an impractical and undeliverable customs arrangement unlike any other in existence
Conversely, the British Government has spent decades arguing against this or that EU directive, on the grounds that it was too burdensome or ill-thought out. We are now in the ludicrous position of asserting that we must accept huge amounts of precisely such EU law, without changing an iota, because it is essential for our economic health – and when we no longer have any ability to influence these laws as they are made.
In that respect we are truly headed for the status of colony – and many will struggle to see the economic or political advantages of that particular arrangement.
It is also clear that by surrendering control over our rulebook for goods and agrifoods (and much else besides) we will make it much more difficult to do free trade deals. And then there is the further impediment of having to argue for an impractical and undeliverable customs arrangement unlike any other in existence.
What is even more disturbing is that this is our opening bid. This is already how we see the end state for the UK – before the other side has made its counter-offer. It is as though we are sending our vanguard into battle with the white flags fluttering above them. Indeed, I was concerned, looking at Friday's document, that there might be further concessions on immigration, or that we might end up effectively paying for access to the single market.
On Friday I acknowledged that my side of the argument were too few to prevail, and congratulated you on at least reaching a Cabinet decision on the way forward. As I said then, the Government now has a song to sing. The trouble is that I have practised the words over the weekend and find that they stick in the throat. We must have collective responsibility. Since I cannot in all conscience champion these proposals, I have sadly concluded that I must go.
I am proud to have served as Foreign Secretary in your Government. As I step down I would like first to thank the patient officers of the Metropolitan Police who have looked after me and my family, at times in demanding circumstances.
I am proud too of the extraordinary men and women of our diplomatic service. Over the last few months they have shown how many friends this country has around the world, as 28 governments expelled Russian spies in an unprecedented protest at the attempted assassination of the Skripals. They have organised a highly successful Commonwealth summit and secured record international support for this Government's campaign for 12 years of quality education for every girl, and much more besides. As I leave office, the FCO now has the largest and by far the most effective diplomatic network of any country in Europe – a continent which we will never leave.
THE RT HON BORIS JOHNSON MP
Dear Boris,
Thank you for your letter relinquishing the office of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.
I am sorry - and a little surprised - to receive it after the productive discussions we had at Chequers on Friday, and the comprehensive and detailed proposal which we agreed as a Cabinet. It is a proposal which will honour the result of the referendum and the commitments we made in our general election manifesto to leave the single market and the customs union. It will mean that we take back control of our borders, our laws, and our money - ending the freedom of movement, ending the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the United Kingdom, and ending the days of sending vast sums of taxpayers' money to the European Union. We will be able to spend that money on our priorities instead - such as the £20 billion increase we have announced for the NHS budget, which means that we will soon be spending an extra £394 million a week on our National Health Service.
As I outlined at Chequers, the agreement we reached requires the full, collective support of Her Majesty's Government. During the EU referendum campaign, collective responsibility on EU policy was temporarily suspended. As we developed our policy on Brexit, I have allowed Cabinet colleagues considerable latitude to express their individual views. But the agreement we reached on Friday marks the point where that is no longer the case, and if you are not able to provide the support we need to secure this deal in the interests of the United Kingdom, it is right that you should step down.
As you do so, I would like to place on record my appreciation of the service you have given to our country, and to the Conservative Party, as Mayor of London and as Foreign Secretary - not least for the passion that you have demonstrated in promoting a Global Britain to the world as we leave the European Union.
Yours ever,
Theresa May
LINKS
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5935371/Jeremy-Hunt-Foreign-Secretary-Boris-Johnson.html
Dear Theresa
It is more than two years since the British people voted to leave the European Union on an unambiguous and categorical promise that if they did so they would be taking back control of their democracy.
They were told that they would be able to manage their own immigration policy, repatriate the sums of UK cash currently spent by the EU, and, above all, that they would be able to pass laws independently and in the interests of the people of this country.
Brexit should be about opportunity and hope. It should be a chance to do things differently, to be more nimble and dynamic, and to maximise the particular advantages of the UK as an open, outward-looking global economy.
That dream is dying, suffocated by needless self-doubt.
We have postponed crucial decisions – including the preparations for no deal, as I argued in my letter to you of last November – with the result that we appear to be heading for a semi-Brexit, with large parts of the economy still locked in the EU system, but with no UK control over that system.
It now seems that the opening bid of our negotiations involves accepting that we are not actually going to be able to make our own laws. Indeed we seem to have gone backwards since the last Chequers meeting in February, when I described my frustrations, as Mayor of London, in trying to protect cyclists from juggernauts. We had wanted to lower the cabin windows to improve visibility; and even though such designs were already on the market, and even though there had been a horrific spate of deaths, mainly of female cyclists, we were told that we had to wait for the EU to legislate on the matter.
So at the previous Chequers session, we thrashed out an elaborate procedure for divergence from EU rules. But even that seems to have been taken of the table and there is in fact no easy UK right of initiative. Yet if Brexit is to mean anything, it must surely give ministers and Parliament the chance to do things differently to protect the public. If a country cannot pass a law to save the lives of female cyclists – when that proposal is supported at every level of UK Government – then I don't see how that country can truly be called independent.
It is also also clear that by surrendering control over our rulebook for goods and agrifoods (and much else besides) we will make it much more difficult to do free trade deals. And then there is the further impediment of having to argue for an impractical and undeliverable customs arrangement unlike any other in existence
Conversely, the British Government has spent decades arguing against this or that EU directive, on the grounds that it was too burdensome or ill-thought out. We are now in the ludicrous position of asserting that we must accept huge amounts of precisely such EU law, without changing an iota, because it is essential for our economic health – and when we no longer have any ability to influence these laws as they are made.
In that respect we are truly headed for the status of colony – and many will struggle to see the economic or political advantages of that particular arrangement.
It is also clear that by surrendering control over our rulebook for goods and agrifoods (and much else besides) we will make it much more difficult to do free trade deals. And then there is the further impediment of having to argue for an impractical and undeliverable customs arrangement unlike any other in existence.
What is even more disturbing is that this is our opening bid. This is already how we see the end state for the UK – before the other side has made its counter-offer. It is as though we are sending our vanguard into battle with the white flags fluttering above them. Indeed, I was concerned, looking at Friday's document, that there might be further concessions on immigration, or that we might end up effectively paying for access to the single market.
On Friday I acknowledged that my side of the argument were too few to prevail, and congratulated you on at least reaching a Cabinet decision on the way forward. As I said then, the Government now has a song to sing. The trouble is that I have practised the words over the weekend and find that they stick in the throat. We must have collective responsibility. Since I cannot in all conscience champion these proposals, I have sadly concluded that I must go.
I am proud to have served as Foreign Secretary in your Government. As I step down I would like first to thank the patient officers of the Metropolitan Police who have looked after me and my family, at times in demanding circumstances.
I am proud too of the extraordinary men and women of our diplomatic service. Over the last few months they have shown how many friends this country has around the world, as 28 governments expelled Russian spies in an unprecedented protest at the attempted assassination of the Skripals. They have organised a highly successful Commonwealth summit and secured record international support for this Government's campaign for 12 years of quality education for every girl, and much more besides. As I leave office, the FCO now has the largest and by far the most effective diplomatic network of any country in Europe – a continent which we will never leave.
THE RT HON BORIS JOHNSON MP
Theresa Mays reply
Dear Boris,
Thank you for your letter relinquishing the office of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.
I am sorry - and a little surprised - to receive it after the productive discussions we had at Chequers on Friday, and the comprehensive and detailed proposal which we agreed as a Cabinet. It is a proposal which will honour the result of the referendum and the commitments we made in our general election manifesto to leave the single market and the customs union. It will mean that we take back control of our borders, our laws, and our money - ending the freedom of movement, ending the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the United Kingdom, and ending the days of sending vast sums of taxpayers' money to the European Union. We will be able to spend that money on our priorities instead - such as the £20 billion increase we have announced for the NHS budget, which means that we will soon be spending an extra £394 million a week on our National Health Service.
As I outlined at Chequers, the agreement we reached requires the full, collective support of Her Majesty's Government. During the EU referendum campaign, collective responsibility on EU policy was temporarily suspended. As we developed our policy on Brexit, I have allowed Cabinet colleagues considerable latitude to express their individual views. But the agreement we reached on Friday marks the point where that is no longer the case, and if you are not able to provide the support we need to secure this deal in the interests of the United Kingdom, it is right that you should step down.
As you do so, I would like to place on record my appreciation of the service you have given to our country, and to the Conservative Party, as Mayor of London and as Foreign Secretary - not least for the passion that you have demonstrated in promoting a Global Britain to the world as we leave the European Union.
Yours ever,
Theresa May
LINKS
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5935371/Jeremy-Hunt-Foreign-Secretary-Boris-Johnson.html
Tory Brexit Chaos
Theresa May won the election (Just) on the mantra of the Labour party being the coalition of chaos. 48 hrs after claiming agreement on the Brexit plan we now have David Davis and Boris Johnson resigning.
Well now your really seeing the real party of Chaos. The Conservatives of Chaos.
Having said that, It was never going to be easy negotiating Brexit without a majority of the country for it. When I say majority I don't mean a 4% majority, to negotiate something of this magnitude the rules of the referendum should have been you needed 60% to win. Anything less and you have the mess we are seeing here. Well thats Cameron for you Mr Vanity himself another Tory that was so far up his own arse he actually believed he could pull off a remain vote and told the EU such.
Its disgraceful that the Tories now seem to be using this as a leadership bid. If it is, its beyond disgraceful, we are months away from the Autumn deadline and the Tories have only just come up with a basic plan of what they want. That in itself is also disgraceful and playing right into the hands of the EU.
I voted to remain but only by the smallest margin and only because I believed it would take 20 years at least to recover from the damage caused. I couldn't vote to leave regardless of the cost to the UK that would not only be stupidity, it would be unpatriotic and Ive yet to see any valid report that promotes a positive picture post Brexit.
- Anyone that thought they were going to get a better deal than those member states left it were living in cookoo land.
- Anyone that's thinks we can leave with no deal is not understanding the damage it will do to businesses in the UK.
- Anyone that thinks its a good idea to stay connected with the EU via customs union etc having thrown away our veto, is not understanding the ramifications as to what the EU will want for it.
- Anyone that thinks Britain can be great again because we once had an empire is living in some drug induced dream land. We can be great but not because we once had an empire so dont use that twaddle as an argument.
How many more businesses will now be ramping up their plans on leaving the UK with this totally chaotic front that the Tories are showing the EU.
Ive yet to see what proposals the Tories have come up with, but whatever it is it still needs to be agreed with the EU and at present they are holding all the cards.
LINKS
Theresa May ~ AKA Mayhem, Maybe, Maybenot
Boris Johnson quits to add to pressure on May over Brexit
Is it really leaving? 'I don't think so,' says Davis
Sunday, 24 June 2018
Jane Fonda betrayed POWs - Not True
Did Jane Fonda betray POWs as per the email and post doing the rounds again.
The facts are, Jerry Driscoll in the video below, states that these claims about himself and Larry Carrigan are NOT TRUE, you cant get better than the truth from the actual person.
Heres part of the post doing the rounds on face Book, the full text is posted below the links
Just to clarify I'm only commenting on whether the supposed facts in the below email are true or false.
They are FALSE, its all rubbish.
Whether she should have gone to Hanoi or had a picture taken is another matter.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4488407/jerry-driscoll
Blame Jane Falsehoods
Did Jane Fonda Betray American POWs in North Vietnam?
How Jane Fonda’s 1972 trip to North Vietnam earned her the nickname ‘Hanoi Jane’
What Did Jane Fonda Really Do Over in Hanoi?
Jane Fonda Urban Legends
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/janefonda25apr05.shtml
Myth Blaster – Hanoi Jane Fonda, “100 Greatest Women” Jul 25
The Truth About My Trip To Hanoi
The facts are, Jerry Driscoll in the video below, states that these claims about himself and Larry Carrigan are NOT TRUE, you cant get better than the truth from the actual person.
Heres part of the post doing the rounds on face Book, the full text is posted below the links
Barbara Walters writes:
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot. The pilot's name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat. In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School was a POW in Ho LoPrison, the "Hanoi Hilton."
Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed, and dressed in clean PJ's, he was ordered to describe for a visiting American "peace activist" the "lenient and humane treatment" he'd received.
He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward onto the camp commandant 's feet, which sent that officer berserk.
In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant's frenzied application of a wooden baton.
Just to clarify I'm only commenting on whether the supposed facts in the below email are true or false.
They are FALSE, its all rubbish.
Whether she should have gone to Hanoi or had a picture taken is another matter.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4488407/jerry-driscoll
Blame Jane Falsehoods
Did Jane Fonda Betray American POWs in North Vietnam?
How Jane Fonda’s 1972 trip to North Vietnam earned her the nickname ‘Hanoi Jane’
What Did Jane Fonda Really Do Over in Hanoi?
Jane Fonda Urban Legends
http://educate-yourself.org/lte/janefonda25apr05.shtml
Myth Blaster – Hanoi Jane Fonda, “100 Greatest Women” Jul 25
The Truth About My Trip To Hanoi
Barbara Walters writes:
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot. The pilot's name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat. In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School was a POW in Ho LoPrison, the "Hanoi Hilton."
Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed, and dressed in clean PJ's, he was ordered to describe for a visiting American "peace activist" the "lenient and humane treatment" he'd received.
He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward onto the camp commandant 's feet, which sent that officer berserk.
In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant's frenzied application of a wooden baton.
From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E's). He spent 6 years in the "Hanoi Hilton". . . The first three of which his family only knew he was "missing in action." His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed and clothed routine in preparation for a "peace delegation" visit.
They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived. Each man secreted a tiny piece of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking each man's hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: "Aren't you sorry you bombed babies?" and "Are you grateful for the humane treatment from your benevolent captors?" Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of paper.
She took them all without missing a beat. . . At the end of the line and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POWs, she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little pieces of paper...
Three men died from the subsequent beatings. Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.
Three men died from the subsequent beatings. Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.
I was a civilian economic development adviser in Vietnam, and was captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in 1968, and held prisoner for over 5 years.
I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in Cambodia; and one year in a 'black box' in Hanoi. My North Vietnamese captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Banme Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried in the jungle near the Cambodian border. At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs.)
We were Jane Fonda's "war criminals."
When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was asked by the camp communist political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received. . . and how different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as "humane and lenient."
Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with my arms outstretched with a large steel weight placed on my hands, and beaten with a bamboo cane.
I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released. I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me.
These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who should be honored as part of "100 Years of Great Women." Lest we forget. . . "100 Years of Great Women" should never include a traitor whose hands are covered with the blood of so many patriots.
There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane's participation in blatant treason, is one of them. Please take the time to forward to as many people as you possibly can. It will eventually end up on her computer, and she needs to know that we will never forget.
RONALD D. SAMPSON, CMSgt,
USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron,
Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431 COMM: 883-6343
USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron,
Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431 COMM: 883-6343
Tuesday, 19 June 2018
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
This goes all the way to the top ......
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) in England and Wales was announced by the British Home Secretary, Theresa May, on 7 July 2014. The inquiry was established to examine how the country's institutions handled their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse.
It was set up after investigations in 2012 and 2013 into the Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal revealed widespread abuse, including claims of abuse stretching back over decades by prominent media and political figures, and inadequate safeguarding by institutions and organisations responsible for child welfare.
So far 3 chairs have stepped down now some might say that, that's a bit unusual?
Materials found at National ArchivesIn January 2015, an academic researcher found in The National Archives a reference to a file regarding allegations of "unnatural" sexual behaviour taking place at Westminster that probably went to the Prime Minister in the early 1980s. The file was entitled "Allegations against former public [missing word] of unnatural sexual proclivities; security aspects 1980 Oct 27 - 1981 Mar 20." The file remains classified as it contained information from the security services and Law Officers. The Cabinet Office stated that any pertinent files would be made available to the forthcoming Independent Panel Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.
Scope
Justice Goddard announced on 27 November 2015 that 12 separate investigations would be undertaken. These would cover:[9]
- Children in the care of Lambeth Council
- Children in the care of Nottinghamshire councils
- Cambridge House, Knowl View and Rochdale Council
- Child sexual abuse in the Anglican Church
- Child sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church
- The sexual abuse of children in custodial institutions
- Child sexual abuse in residential schools
- The internet and child sexual abuse
- Child exploitation by organised networks
- The protection of children outside the United Kingdom
- Accountability and reparations for victims and survivors
- Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster
She said that the scale of the inquiry was unprecedented, and that it would take five years, but she was determined that it would succeed. She added that all the investigations would start immediately, and that most if not all would include public hearings.
More to update.........
"I was taken to one side and it was made clear to me, I was told that Theresa May was going to be the Prime Minister, this inquiry was going to be part of this, and that if I didn't toe the line and do I was told, if I tried to get information out, I would be discredited by her advisors."
Evans also claimed that, when talking to the Home Affairs Select Committee, she was given a 23-page document of what she should say and told then-chair Keith Vaz "I fear that I may not be able to tell the truth because I have been told what I may and may not say."
Although Evans and her colleagues were promised the inquiry would be independent, she told John "there was no independence" and the confidentiality clause imposed on all panel members facilitated the "suppression" of the truth.
When asked who wanted to suppress the information, she said "my belief is that it was the Home Office."
LINKS
Wikipedia: Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual AbuseChild abuse inquiry member: 'I was silenced in 2015 to ensure Theresa May could become Prime Minister'
The Westminster child abuse ‘coverup’: how much did MPs know?
Edwardian house at heart of a long-simmering sex scandal
UPDATED
TheLondonEconomic: Westminster child sex abuse probe hears how parties and police covered up abuse
Monday, 18 June 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













