Showing posts with label Covid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covid. Show all posts

Friday, 13 December 2024

The Effects of 15 Years of Tory Government and Economic Costs of Brexit and COVID-19 on the UK

 

The Effects of 15 Years of Tory Government and Economic Costs of Brexit and COVID-19 on the UK

1. Economic Impact of COVID-19

Government Borrowing and Debt: The UK government borrowed approximately £304 billion during the 2020/21 financial year to manage the economic fallout from the pandemic. This raised the national debt to around £2.22 trillion (106% of GDP) by March 2021.

Fraud, Error, and Procurement Waste: A significant portion of the COVID-19 expenditure was lost to mismanagement:

  • Fraud and Error in Schemes: Approximately £4.5 billion was lost across schemes like the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and Eat Out to Help Out. Of this, £1.1 billion has been recovered.

  • Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Over £7 billion was at risk due to fraud and credit risks.

  • Procurement Issues: The Department of Health and Social Care wrote off £14.9 billion on unusable PPE, part of the £48.1 billion spent on contracts.

In total, an estimated £26.4 billion was wasted on fraud, error, and poorly managed procurement.

2. Economic Costs of Brexit

Long-Term Productivity Losses: The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that Brexit will reduce the UK's long-term productivity by 4% compared to remaining in the EU.

Cumulative Financial Costs:

  • By 2023, Brexit had reduced the UK's Gross Value Added (GVA) by approximately £140 billion.

  • Projections suggest a cumulative cost of £311 billion by 2035 due to diminished trade, reduced investment, and weaker productivity.

Sectoral Impacts:

  • Trade: Exports and imports are forecast to be around 15% lower in the long term.

  • Investment: Business investment could have been 25% higher without Brexit-related uncertainty.

  • Labour Market: Post-Brexit immigration rules have led to labour shortages in transport, hospitality, and retail sectors, increasing operational costs and reducing output.

3. Key Comparisons and Overlapping Effects

While COVID-19’s economic impact was immediate and unprecedented, Brexit’s costs are more sustained and systemic. Both events significantly increased the UK’s debt and reduced economic potential:

  • COVID-19’s response measures added over £300 billion to public debt, with notable inefficiencies in spending.

  • Brexit’s economic adjustments are expected to reduce long-term GDP by up to 4%, costing hundreds of billions over the coming decades.

4. Challenges for Any Future Government

Any incoming government will face a monumental task in addressing the combined economic fallout of Brexit and COVID-19. Key priorities include:

  • Fiscal Reforms: Reducing waste, improving procurement practices, and targeting resources effectively to rebuild public trust.

  • Economic Stimulus: Encouraging investment, addressing trade deficits, and fostering productivity growth to offset long-term damage.

  • Labour Market Adjustments: Tackling post-Brexit labour shortages through strategic immigration policies and workforce development.

  • Long-Term Planning: Addressing the root causes of economic stagnation with forward-thinking policies across multiple sectors.

Clearing up these issues will likely require difficult decisions around taxation, spending cuts, and targeted investments to balance economic recovery with fiscal responsibility.

Conclusion

The combined impact of 15 years of Tory government, Brexit, and COVID-19 has placed substantial strain on the UK’s economy, manifesting in increased debt, reduced trade, weakened productivity, and ongoing labour market challenges. Enhanced oversight and strategic economic planning are essential to mitigate further losses and rebuild economic resilience.

Sunday, 27 February 2022

Ukraine Invasion: American funded germ warfare labs in Ukraine

American funded germ warfare labs in Ukraine

The US does fund a Biological Threat Reduction Program in Ukraine, as it does in other countries in the world. Which appears to be based on identifying outbreaks (deliberate, accidental, or natural) of the world’s most dangerous infectious diseases. The latest of which was Covid.

Some might suggest it's just a cover for Germ Warfare but still seems like a strange place to base them if they were germ warfare. Plus Russia is well aware of them and has never asked for them to be moved.

From a common-sense point of view why would the US base germ warfare labs in a country so close to Russia, so easily spied upon by Russia, so easily attacked by Russia, so easily captured by Russia. The US could base germ warfare research labs anywhere in the world, way away from Russia and probably do.

Another example of Putin's multiple lines of disinformation, building a reason for continued aggression.




LINKS



















Thursday, 10 February 2022

COVID ~ Did the UK run out of PPE during the 1st wave of Covid

Just going by the parliamentary public spending watchdog report the answer has to be YES!

Why would any Government go out and source substandard quality PPE if we had enough?

May 1 2020

The tweets were terse and, to the uninitiated, obscure. “Gowns” — “examination gloves” — “green aprons” — read the messages from the accounts of procurement leaders in the UK’s National Health Service. But to their colleagues in other hospitals, each represented a cry for help, signalling shortfalls of key items of personal protective equipment (PPE) needed to keep clinicians safe while they fought a once-in-a-century battle against coronavirus.

November 25, 2020

Today’s report by the National Audit Office (NAO) finds that government was initially reliant on stockpiles of personal protective equipment (PPE) that proved inadequate for the COVID-19 pandemic. In a rapidly deteriorating situation government made a huge effort to boost supply, but it has paid very high prices due to unusual market conditions and many front-line workers reported shortages of PPE.
10 February 2021

The UK government wasted hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money on poor quality and unusable personal protective equipment (PPE) while leaving frontline workers insufficiently protected from covid-19, the parliamentary public spending watchdog has concluded.


 

LINKS

https://fullfact.org/health/ppe-shortages-first-wave

FT - How poor planning left the UK without enough PPE

BMJ - Covid-19: Government wasted millions on poor quality PPE, spending watchdog finds

NAO - The supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sunday, 30 January 2022

Labour won't get into power for the next 2 or 3 General Elections.

Doesn't matter how much Labour try to slag the Government down with their little schemes, Labour won't get into power for the next 2 or 3 General Elections.


Hopefully, because by then Tories really will have no excuse for their incompetence and we can check how much bankrupt Britain (Their words not mine) owes by then.

They always seem to have something that comes along and saves them. Thatcher it was the Falklands (By design or incompetence? another argument) The Cameron, May & Johnson, run its been covid. We won't bring Brexit into it because everything was going to be so much better, so it can only be covid.

There's one gamble that did pay off.... the Vaccinations.  Although Johnson is like the gambler that plays the fruit machines puts in £900 wins £400 and claims he's won.

The rest of the gamble/incompetence has cost fortunes, the one pays for the rest, although we are not seeing any financial evidence of that yet.

Upping NI to "Fund the NHS" just means that those with money pay less, normal for the tories.
I'm all for funding the NHS but everyone should pay the same percentage and not when the Tories are spunking our money up the wall ...to coin a phrase.

And let's not forget we would not have the NHS if it wasn't for William Beveridge (Beveridge Report 1942) who was Liberal and the Labour government who put it in place although Bevin couldn't get all measures through which is why doctors surgeries are privately owned to this day amongst other things.

The NHS was put in place when the UK really was bankrupt after the war. Would the Tories have done the same?

I'm sure you have availed yourself of NHS services over the years?

What would your circumstances be had you had to rely on the insurance-based model that was in place before the war that few could afford?

Your treatments and drugs over the years would have cost hundreds of thousands of pounds and it's unlikely you would still be covered on insurance.  Unless you're lucky enough to have not needed it in which case what a relief to know that it's always there as a safety blanket for that unlucky moment.





LINKS
https://www.income-tax.co.uk