Showing posts with label Tory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tory. Show all posts

Friday, 13 December 2024

The Effects of 15 Years of Tory Government and Economic Costs of Brexit and COVID-19 on the UK

 

The Effects of 15 Years of Tory Government and Economic Costs of Brexit and COVID-19 on the UK

1. Economic Impact of COVID-19

Government Borrowing and Debt: The UK government borrowed approximately £304 billion during the 2020/21 financial year to manage the economic fallout from the pandemic. This raised the national debt to around £2.22 trillion (106% of GDP) by March 2021.

Fraud, Error, and Procurement Waste: A significant portion of the COVID-19 expenditure was lost to mismanagement:

  • Fraud and Error in Schemes: Approximately £4.5 billion was lost across schemes like the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and Eat Out to Help Out. Of this, £1.1 billion has been recovered.

  • Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Over £7 billion was at risk due to fraud and credit risks.

  • Procurement Issues: The Department of Health and Social Care wrote off £14.9 billion on unusable PPE, part of the £48.1 billion spent on contracts.

In total, an estimated £26.4 billion was wasted on fraud, error, and poorly managed procurement.

2. Economic Costs of Brexit

Long-Term Productivity Losses: The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that Brexit will reduce the UK's long-term productivity by 4% compared to remaining in the EU.

Cumulative Financial Costs:

  • By 2023, Brexit had reduced the UK's Gross Value Added (GVA) by approximately £140 billion.

  • Projections suggest a cumulative cost of £311 billion by 2035 due to diminished trade, reduced investment, and weaker productivity.

Sectoral Impacts:

  • Trade: Exports and imports are forecast to be around 15% lower in the long term.

  • Investment: Business investment could have been 25% higher without Brexit-related uncertainty.

  • Labour Market: Post-Brexit immigration rules have led to labour shortages in transport, hospitality, and retail sectors, increasing operational costs and reducing output.

3. Key Comparisons and Overlapping Effects

While COVID-19’s economic impact was immediate and unprecedented, Brexit’s costs are more sustained and systemic. Both events significantly increased the UK’s debt and reduced economic potential:

  • COVID-19’s response measures added over £300 billion to public debt, with notable inefficiencies in spending.

  • Brexit’s economic adjustments are expected to reduce long-term GDP by up to 4%, costing hundreds of billions over the coming decades.

4. Challenges for Any Future Government

Any incoming government will face a monumental task in addressing the combined economic fallout of Brexit and COVID-19. Key priorities include:

  • Fiscal Reforms: Reducing waste, improving procurement practices, and targeting resources effectively to rebuild public trust.

  • Economic Stimulus: Encouraging investment, addressing trade deficits, and fostering productivity growth to offset long-term damage.

  • Labour Market Adjustments: Tackling post-Brexit labour shortages through strategic immigration policies and workforce development.

  • Long-Term Planning: Addressing the root causes of economic stagnation with forward-thinking policies across multiple sectors.

Clearing up these issues will likely require difficult decisions around taxation, spending cuts, and targeted investments to balance economic recovery with fiscal responsibility.

Conclusion

The combined impact of 15 years of Tory government, Brexit, and COVID-19 has placed substantial strain on the UK’s economy, manifesting in increased debt, reduced trade, weakened productivity, and ongoing labour market challenges. Enhanced oversight and strategic economic planning are essential to mitigate further losses and rebuild economic resilience.

Saturday, 22 June 2019

Mark Field and the Greenpeace protest

I can’t believe it, how this story of a person being forcibly ejected from somewhere they shouldn't be has been spun into some sort of violence against women project and I cant believe Im defending a Tory but hey ho.

Bearing in mind that I’m a lefty and have no love for Tory policies, however I don’t agree with people throwing stuff over politicians nor do I agree with them being knifed and killed, nor do I agree with terrorists blowing people up nor do I agree with domestic abuse or intimidation.  Now having got that out of the way.

Under the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, people can use "reasonable force" in self-defence, to defend someone else, to prevent a crime or to assist in the arrest of someone.
The law says you do not have to wait until someone is attacked: Fear of attack or fear that someone else could be attacked may be sufficient.
How much force is reasonable comes down to the circumstances of each case.

So Let’s stick to the facts shall we.
  1. Was this person in a place they should have been = NO
  2. Did mark Field seek out this person with the intention of using violence or intimidation = NO
  3. Do we live in unprecedented times with regards to terrorists = YES
  4. Is our security alert status at one of the highest levels = YES
  5. Could this person have been carrying a knife = YES
  6. Could this person have been carrying a bomb = YES
  7. Could this person have been carrying an acid spray = YES
  8. Was the person injured, whilst being removed = NO
  9. If they weren’t injured was there an inappropriate use of force = NO
  10. Do we each have a responsibility to not put ourselves in harm’s way = YES
If you study the video you can see in the first few seconds Field is struggling with where to put his hands.

"Yes but everyone knows that Greenpeace are peaceful protesters"…. sorry unfortunately these days it only takes one crank to decide to change that.

Many are jumping on the band wagon trying to insinuate this is similar to domestic abuse. It’s not, whilst domestic abuse is abhorrent this is a totally different situation for the 10 reasons I’ve listed above. It’s actually insulting to victims of domestic abuse to suggest that it’s similar.

The rest of the protesters were ejected in a similar forceful manner, nothing being said about them.
At the end of the day none of the protestors were injured, this is all about publicity which they achieved and now others are jumping on the publicity bandwagon.

At the end of the day the question "was reasonable force used" can only really be answered in a court. As no one is pressing charges that wont happen.


SOAPBOX OPINION

No one was injured therefore reasonable force was used.

The person shouldn't have been there and certainly shouldn't have been trying to approach the main table.


SOAPBOX UPDATE

Some people have suggested that the protester was walking slowly handing out leaflets.
This is plainly not true as the person is walking quite quickly and definitely not handing out leaflets.


Fields spots the person at the last moment and puts out arm to stop them.
Protester continues to try and force their way through.
Fields responds with force to stop them and marches them out.
Ill reiterate again No one was injured therefore reasonable force was used.


Wednesday, 19 June 2019

Lets vote in someone that thinks fcuking pigs heads and burning £50 notes in front of homeless people is good sport.

I know ....lets vote in someone who was member of a club that thinks fcuking pigs heads and burning £50 notes in front of homeless people is good sport. 

Great idea sounds like the perfect candidate.....

Oh he's also been sacked twice for lying and has a history of misinformation you could list on a bog roll ..... 

Great even better sounds perfect .......

....and he's going to give us all a tax cut ...well not all ...just ..you know ...US 


.....super ...is it my birthday?




LINKS
Independent: Rory Stewart is out. The Tories have killed off the truth teller so that the lies might live

Wednesday, 16 January 2019

Facebook goes into melt down with anti Corbyn memes.




A narrow miss of getting a no confidence vote in the worst Tory government for years and Facebook goes into melt down with anti Corbyn memes.

Luckily as could be seen in the last General Election the public are seeing through the mis-information, lies, insults etc.