Monday, 16 April 2018

Tear Gas is a Chemical Weapon, ain't that Ironic



Whether this meme depicts a US warship or even US protesters is irrelevant. The message and irony were obvious.

However some were out claiming that Pepper spray or CS gas is not a chemical weapon. 

Well sorry to disappoint you folks but they are chemical weapons and they are banned for use in warfare under article 1.5 of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

But there are no restrictions to their domestic use as a “riot control agent.”

That's whats Ironic


Pepper spray is banned for use in war by Article I.5 of the Chemical Weapons Convention, which bans the use of all riot control agents in warfare whether lethal or less-than-lethal.

Article I. General Obligations
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never under any circumstances:
(a) To develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile or retain chemical weapons, or transfer, directly or indirectly, chemical weapons to anyone;
(b) To use chemical weapons;
(c) To engage in any military preparations to use chemical weapons;
(d) To assist, encourage or induce, in any way, anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention.
2. Each State Party undertakes to destroy chemical weapons it owns or possesses, or that are located in any place under its jurisdiction or control, in accordance with the provisions of this Convention.
3. Each State Party undertakes to destroy all chemical weapons it abandoned on the territory of another State Party, in accordance with the provisions of this Convention.
4. Each State Party undertakes to destroy any chemical weapons production facilities it owns or possesses, or that are located in any place under its jurisdiction or control, in accordance with the provisions of this Convention.
5. Each State Party undertakes not to use riot control agents as a method of warfare.
Riot control agents including tear gas and pepper spray are banned in international warfare under both the 1925 Geneva Protocol and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). The CWC defines chemical weapons as “munitions and devices that are designed to cause death or other harm through toxic chemicals” that lead to “death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals.”  While tear gas and pepper spray, under international law, are banned as a “method of warfare”, there are no restrictions to their domestic use as a “riot control agent.” According to the CWC, “riot control agents” are any chemicals which are not specifically listed in their list of prohibited chemicals and that can cause in humans rapid “sensory irritation or disabling physical effects which disappear within a short time following termination of exposure.”  Under Article II Section 9 of the CWC, the use of such chemicals for “law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes” is not prohibited under the Convention.

LINKS
https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/articles/article-i-general-obligations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_spray
http://teargasresearch.com/?page_id=16


Sunday, 15 April 2018

Abrey Bailey we salute you


Well this is class, don't know who Aubrey Bailey is but they certainly have a handle on the Middle East.



“Are you confused by what is going on in the Middle-East? Let me explain. We support the Iraqi government in its fight against Islamic State (IS/ISIL/ISIS). We don’t like IS but IS is supported by Saudi Arabia whom we do like. We don’t like President Assad in Syria. We support the fight against him, but not IS, which is also fighting against him.
“We don’t like Iran, but the Iranian government supports the Iraqi gov’t against IS. So, some of our friends support our enemies and some of our enemies are our friends, and some of our enemies are fighting our other enemies, whom we don’t want to lose, but we don’t our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win.
“If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they might be replaced by people we like even less. And, all this was started by us invading a country to drive out terrorists who weren’t actually there until we went in to drive them out – do you understand now?”

Saturday, 14 April 2018

National Assessment document on Chemical attack of 7 April 2018

Ok well this is the 1st official document that Ive found

If you can call it official.

National Assessment document on Chemical attack of 7 April 2018 (Douma, Eastern Ghouta, Syria) and Syria’s clandestine chemical weapons programme - 14.04.2018
"Several lethal chemical attacks took place in the town of Douma in the late afternoon of saturday, 7 April 2018, and we assess with a high degree of confidence that they were carried out by the Syrian regime."




Again there are no definite's in this document with a range of comments like...

"We asses with a high degree of confidence"

"Sufficient to attribute responsibility"

But the limited evidence is there, in the document so i suggest you read it.

Maybe definite's are not available in this time of technology, I don't know. Be nice if there is a possibility of starting WW3, that there were a few definite's, before doing so.

Document was released after the UK, US and France airstrikes.

Suspected use of chemical weapons in Douma



"Time and again at a press conference at Downing Street this morning the prime minister spelled out the strikes that took place overnight were limited, targeted and a response to the suspected use of chemical weapons in Douma"

Why do we think we have the right to police other countries that are not threatening us?

Trump and May were very quick to respond launching attacks before inspectors had visited. Why?

Hundreds of atrocities happen all over the world and we do nothing, why?

Strange that this has happened, so close to the Chemical attack in Salisbury, allegedly by Russia. No proof has yet been released.

Lets just hope that they are right because if the Rebels managed to somehow release chemical weapons and make it look like Assad then they achieved their goal.

Or did the US, UK and France want a reason to attack?



LINKS
PM faces 'almighty row' over Syria strikes

Friday, 13 April 2018

What possible motive might have triggered Syria to launch a chemical attack

What possible motive might have triggered Syria to launch a chemical attack at this time in this place.


Former British Commander in Iraq Gets Abruptly Cut Off

"What possible motive might have triggered Syria to launch a chemical attack at this time in this place."



We can only wonder what he was going to say next.

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Syrian Chemical attack


  • Similar to the Salisbury chemical attack; Where no proof has been made public that confirms Russia did it. (Just that they had the capability and the inclination)
  • In Syria we have no proof that Assad did it?  (Just the capability and the inclination)
  • Both Assad and Rebels have chemical weapons. (Possibility and probability exist on both sides)
  • So the possible scenarios are
    • Assad forces did carry out the attack.
    • Assad forces hit a Chemical weapons dump held by rebels.
    • Rebels carried out the attack to get support from west as they are losing.
    • US/UK covert forces carried out/enable the attack to pave the way for attacks in Syria.
    • There maybe other scenarios that ive not thought of.

  • Lets go to proof
    • All ive seen is comments like "highly likely", "all the indications are that" this is not evidence of proof when there are other possibility's that exist.
    • Trump said "We have irrefutable evidence" but then didn't say what that evidence was.
  • Lets look at reasons for carrying out such an attack
    • Assad
      • Hes possibly a physco its about the only reason for
      • or maybe he thought it would scare the rebels out
      • or maybe he thought it would scare the people out
      • Assad is winning in Syria, the town involved is the last stronghold of the Rebels, why risk international condemnation?
    • Rebels
      • They are losing, enabling by whatever means, the release of chemical agent gets them World Wide support.
    • US/UK
      • Its well known they wanted Assad gone.
      • Assad is backed by Russia, Russia has a Mediterranean military base.
      • Im sure the US would like Russia out of its Mediterranean military base.
Just as in Iraq where we now have various UK and US oil company's running the oil. We now have gas muddying the waters in Syria. Or is that just a nice by product of a much bigger picture?




"Ministers said it was "highly likely" the Assad regime was responsible for a suspected chemical attack"
"Mrs May has said "all the indications" are that the Syrian regime of president Bashar al-Assad, which denies mounting a chemical attack, was responsible for the alleged attack in the formerly rebel-held town of Douma."
"Evidence is still being gathered, but US officials are understood to have results from blood and urine samples that indicate chlorine and a nerve agent were used in the Syrian town of Douma.
But they privately admit they can't be 100% sure."

Is "Cant be 100% sure" good enough?
Is "highly likelygood enough?
Is "all the indications" good enough?

To those that would say we cant possibly let the killing of innocent people go unchecked. There were between 500,000 and 1 million killed in the Rwandan genocide and the UK and the US didn't bat an eyelid.
"During these events and in the aftermath, the United Nations (UN) and countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Belgium were criticized for their inaction and failure to strengthen the force and mandate of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) peacekeepers. Other observers criticized the government of France for alleged support of the Hutu government after the genocide had begun."


LINKS
Syria 'chemical attack': France's President Macron 'has proof'
Top UN Inspector: Assad Not Responsible For Chemical Weapons Attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie_Energy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
UN Sources Say Syrian Rebels - Not Assad - Used Sarin Gas
Jeremy Corbyn: May waiting for Trump instructions on Syria
Theresa May 'to act on Syria without MPs' vote'
Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion From The Iraq War
UN Mission Report Confirms that “Opposition” Rebels Used Chemical Weapons against Civilians and Government Forces
Yes, the US-Supported Syrian “Rebels” DO Have Access to Chemical Weapons
US says it has proof Syria carried out Douma gas attack
What Really Happened in the Douma Chemical Attack?
Confirmation of Syria chemical attack will take weeks
NOW MATTIS ADMITS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE ASSAD USED POISON GAS ON HIS PEOPLE: OPINION
Syria Airstrikes Instantly Added Nearly $5 Billion to Missile-Makers' Stock Value
Rwandan genocide



Sunday, 8 April 2018

Questions for Alec



"The police are not asking for extra money, they say they can do it on existing budgets."

Please post a media link that substantiates this claim


"The police where constantly asking for him (Khan) to do something about it he chose not to"

Please post a media link that substantiates this claim


"But he could have listened to the met he could have done something"

Please post a media link that substantiates that the Met have been asking Khan to change something.


"The police are telling khan what needs to be done, focus resources into the gang areas where these crimes are happening and increasing stop and search. To get knives and guns of the streets and arrest those carrying weapons."

Please post a media link that substantiates that the Met have been telling Khan what needs to be done.

Saturday, 7 April 2018

Has austerity caused the rise in murders in London



"Austerity is contributing to a spate of youth murders on the streets of London, as poverty-stricken households and “decimated” youth services push young people into a cycle of violence, practitioners have warned." Apr 2018


“People don’t realise how much the youth sector has been decimated. The youth and community sector has been cut to shreds. Since the recession, we’ve had cuts year on year. Now we rely on competing for funding bids. It’s really hit this year, we’re at crisis point.”   Apr 2018


"Years of budget cuts partly to blame, says police force, as recorded crime increased in virtually every category in 2016-17"   Apr 2017


“If there are fewer police on the streets or able to respond to crime then people are less likely to be deterred from criminal acts. This is also linked to financial hardship. We have people now using food banks so it should come as no surprise the people in difficult circumstances resort to shoplifting.” May 2017

"Since 2010, front line public services have experienced £18 billion worth of spending cuts. Youth services, social care, early intervention, and housing services have been particularly affected. The policy of austerity has had an especially large impact on those young people most affected by knife and gun violence. They no longer have access to the Educational Maintenance Allowance, Connexions Careers Service or housing benefits, and youth support services have been decimated."   Feb 2018

"Due to spending cuts there has been less policing, community centres are closing. There's been not money directed at the third sector for a while and with all these cuts and reductions we've got more young people falling out on to the streets."   April 2018




LINKS
Spate in London youth murders directly linked to poverty and austerity, practitioners warn
Met warns of steep rise in London gun and knife crime
Police cuts and austerity blamed for shoplifting gangs who fear nothing
London killings: Why are they happening and what can be done?

Wednesday, 4 April 2018

Boris Johnson should resign


Is it possible for this government to make an even bigger mess of this nerve agent issue.
Totally inept.
Johnson should resign he's making the UK a laughing stock. Give the Russians some more ammunition... come on Bojo you absolute idiot.


"Once again, Boris Johnson is a liability to Britain. Why is he still in the job?"

"Foreign Office deletes tweet saying Porton Down confirmed Salisbury novichok produced in Russia"

LINKS
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/04/boris-johnson-liability-porton-down-russia 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/apr/04/labour-criticises-boris-johnson-over-his-porton-downnovichok-claims-as-opcw-meets-politics-live

The nerve agent is “of a type developed by Russia”.


But no one has actually confirmed it was actually made in Russia?” 

Timeline of events
  • Yulia Skripal flew into London's Heathrow Airport on a flight from Russia at about 14:40 GMT on 3 March
  • On 4 March, at about 09:15 GMT, Mr Skripal's car was seen in Salisbury in the area of London Road, Churchill Way North and Wilton Road
  • At 13:30 GMT his car was seen driving down Devizes Road, towards the town centre
  • Mr Skripal and his daughter arrived at the Sainsbury's upper level car park at the Maltings shopping precinct at 13:40 GMT
  • Police said the pair went to The Mill pub before going to Zizzi restaurant at 14:20 GMT, staying until 15:35 GMT
  • At 16:15 GMT emergency services received the first report of an incident.
  • Police found the pair on a bench outside Zizzi in an "extremely serious condition"
  • A police officer who fell ill after attending the incident - Det Sgt Nick Bailey - was treated in hospital but discharged on 22 March
  • 48 people were assessed in hospital in relation to the incident
  • Only Mr Skripal and his daughter Yulia remain in hospital
  • Investigators have identified 131 people who have potentially been in contact with the nerve agent. None has shown symptoms

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said Russian President Vladimir Putin was "overwhelmingly likely" to have ordered the attack.
He also said the UK government had evidence Russia had been stockpiling the nerve agent used in the attack over the last 10 years and had investigated ways of delivering such weapons for assassination.

OK two points regarding the above.

  1. "Overwhelmingly likely" is not irrefutable evidence.
  2. If the "UK Government had evidence that Russia had been stockpiling the nerve agent used in the attack over the last 10 years" why hadn't the UK government reported it to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). 


“The same people who assured you Saddam Hussein had WMDs now assure you Russian ‘novichok’ nerve agents are being wielded by Vladimir Putin to attack people on British soil.”

Aitkenhead said the government had reached its conclusion that Russia was responsible for the Salisbury attack by combining the laboratory’s scientific findings with information from other sources. 
The UK government moved quickly to make it clear that the prime minister, Theresa May, had always been clear the assessment from Porton Down was “only one part of the intelligence picture”. The comments came hours before an extraordinary meeting in The Hague of the executive council of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), called by Russia.
However, two weeks ago Boris Johnson was asked by an interviewer on Deutsche Welle, Germany’s public international broadcaster, how the UK had been able to find out the novichok originated from Russia so quickly.
He replied: “When I look at the evidence, the people from Porton Down, the laboratory, they were absolutely categorical. I asked the guy myself, I said: ‘Are you sure?’ And he said: ‘There’s no doubt.’ So we have very little alternative but to take the action that we have taken.”

Here's a question...
We are led to believe the highest concentration of the Nerve Agent was on his door. The police went straight to his house the same day. It was four days later they turned up with protective suits. How come the police that entered the house, unprotected, through the door that we are told had the most contamination on it are not all in hospital?


In 2010 on a TV interview Putin said this
“Traitors will kick the bucket, believe me. Those other folks betrayed their friends, their brother in arms,” Mr Putin said.
“Whatever they got in exchange for it, those 30 pieces of silver they were given, they will choke on them.”

An interesting twist if true ...
Julia Davis@JuliaDavisNews
's state TV reports that an unnamed high-level White House source quietly told the Russians that the number of Russian diplomats in the U.S. is not being cut (they can send 60 other diplomats to replace the ones being expelled). They quote the source: "The doors are open."
10:08 PM - Mar 29, 2018

Unfortunately we will never know now... even if there was proof that it wasn't Russia. Do we really think that all the countries who have accused Russia will climb down and apologise. Nyet... that's why it was dangerous to claim that it was Russia when they havnt got conclusive proof. Once they had that, it would be fair game... Russia couldn't deny it and the world wouldn't be dealing with the onset of a new cold war.

I mean lets face it with Russia's history it probably was them, but I feel its a bit gun ho to go off making accusations without irrefutable evidence. In this area Corbyn has proved to be the sensible one yet again. Maintaining that we should not rush ahead of the available evidence.

If it was Russia then no one wants to see them get away with it again, if indeed they have in the past. Again no irrefutable evidence has been put forward. 

But also we shouldn't be too quick to rush into a new cold war based on a mistake and politicians have made a few of those in the past.


LINKS
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/boris-johnson-issues-completely-new-story-on-russian-novichoks
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/16/skripal-attack-talk-war-vladimir-putin-theresa-may?CMP=share_btn_fb
https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/unlikely-that-vladimir-putin-behind-skripal-poisoning-1.3425736
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/vladimir-putin-demands-thorough-probe-into-salisbury-poisonings/ar-AAvq8gE?li=AAmiR2Z&ocid=spartanntp
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sergei-skripal-mi6-handler-s-network-of-dissidents-78ckhrvcm
Russian spy: The police, the public and the poison
Russian spy: What we know so far
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201803131062469325-russia-nerve-agent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/uk-russia-nerve-agent-attack-spy-poisoning-sergei-skripal-salisbury-accusations-evidence-explanation-a8258911.html
https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/14/17120696/russian-novichok-skripal-nerve-agent-chemical-weapon-poisoning-england
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/14/nerve-agent-novichok-produced-russia-site-expert
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/15/uks-claims-questioned-doubts-emerge-about-source-of-salisburys-novichok
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/no-10-tries-to-calm-russia-row-amid-cold-war-rhetoric
Russia spy row: UK lab could be poison source, says ambassador
The long, terrifying history of Russian dissidents being poisoned abroad
Alexander Litvinenko: Profile of murdered Russian spy
Video re-emerges of Putin threat that 'traitors will kick the bucket'
https://www.rt.com/news/422871-russia-questions-uk-skripal-case/

PUTIN LINKS
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/putin-failed-scare-world-180305232554472.html
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin
Putin promises spending spree in pre-election speech
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/how-putin-does-it/
http://www.russialies.com/

Thursday, 22 March 2018

Boris Johnson A Categorical Liar - republished

Is it coincidence that local elections are looming on 5th May?
...................................................................................................

Evidence submitted by the British government in court today proves, beyond any doubt, that Boris Johnson has been point blank lying about the degree of certainty Porton Down scientists have about the Skripals being poisoned with a Russian “novichok” agent.
Yesterday in an interview with Deutsche Welt Boris Johnson claimed directly Porton Down had told him they positively identified the nerve agent as Russian:
You argue that the source of this nerve agent, Novichok, is Russia. How did you manage to find it out so quickly? Does Britain possess samples of it?
Let me be clear with you … When I look at the evidence, I mean the people from Porton Down, the laboratory …
So they have the samples …
They do. And they were absolutely categorical and I asked the guy myself, I said, “Are you sure?” And he said there’s no doubt.
I knew and had published from my own whistleblowers that this is a lie. Until now I could not prove it. But today I can absolutely prove it, due to the judgement at the High Court case which gave permission for new blood samples to be taken from the Skripals for use by the OPCW. Justice Williams included in his judgement a summary of the evidence which tells us, directly for the first time, what Porton Down have actually said:
The Evidence
16. The evidence in support of the application is contained within the applications
themselves (in particular the Forms COP 3) and the witness statements.
17. I consider the following to be the relevant parts of the evidence. I shall identify the
witnesses only by their role and shall summarise the essential elements of their
evidence.
i) CC: Porton Down Chemical and Biological Analyst
Blood samples from Sergei Skripal and Yulia Skripal were analysed and the
findings indicated exposure to a nerve agent or related compound. The samples
tested positive for the presence of a Novichok class nerve agent OR CLOSELY RELATED AGENT.
The emphasis is mine. This sworn Court evidence direct from Porton Down is utterly incompatible with what Boris Johnson has been saying. The truth is that Porton Down have not even positively identified this as a “Novichok”, as opposed to “a closely related agent”. Even if it were a “Novichok” that would not prove manufacture in Russia, and a “closely related agent” could be manufactured by literally scores of state and non-state actors.
This constitutes irrefutable evidence that the government have been straight out lying – to Parliament, to the EU, to NATO, to the United Nations, and above all to the people – about their degree of certainty of the origin of the attack. It might well be an attack originating in Russia, but there are indeed other possibilities and investigation is needed. As the government has sought to whip up jingoistic hysteria in advance of forthcoming local elections, the scale of the lie has daily increased.
On a sombre note, I am very much afraid the High Court evidence seems to indicate there is very little chance the Skripals will ever recover; one of the reasons the judge gave for his decision is that samples taken now will be better for analysis than samples taken post mortem.
——————————————————-
This website remains under a massive DOS attack which has persisted for more than 24 hours now, but so far the defences are holding. Some strange form of “ghost banning” is also affecting both my twitter and Facebook feeds. So please
a) Feel free to repost, republish, translate or spread this article anywhere and anyway you can. All copyright is waived.
b) If you came here by Twitter, please retweet but also in addition create a new tweet yourself containing a link to this post (or to any other site on which you have placed the information)
c) If you came here by Facebook, again please share but also in addition create a new post yourself which contains the information and the link.
The state and corporate media now have evidence of the vast discrepancy between what May and Johnson are saying, and the truth about the Porton Down scientists’ position. I am afraid to say I expect this to make no difference whatsoever to the propaganda output of the BBC.

Sunday, 18 March 2018

Well done Ireland - Grand Slam and 6 Nation champions

To go to the fortresses of both France and England and pull of wins was no mean feat in itself. So fair play to Ireland well deserved Champions.

Oh and Happy St Patricks Day :-)


This stunning piece of vocal work I stumbled across seemed appropriate instead of the normal rugby highlights.


The Parting Glass - Peter Hollens


Oh OK here's the Irish Rugby best bits ...



Demand that the BBC publicly apologise to Jeremy Corbyn

Demand that the BBC publicly apologise to Jeremy Corbyn


On March 15th, the BBC broadcast an edition of Newsnight, the main focus of which was the alleged poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.

As the backdrop for the programme, the BBC used an image of the Kremlin, onto which it pasted a photo of Jeremy Corbyn, which had been digitally altered to make it look as if he was wearing a Russian hat.

The implication here is clear - the BBC deliberately sought to imply that Mr Corbyn has connections with Russia.

The BBC's denial that the photo was altered is insulting. Anybody can see by comparing the original photo and the one broadcast by the BBC that the photo has been deliberately altered. The BBC's denial is confirmation of their complicity.

This action represents a State-funded, Government-controlled national broadcaster altering images of the Leader of Her Majesty's Opposition, in order to imply that he is in cahoots with a foreign power.

This goes beyond bias - it is Government propaganda.

We demand that the BBC should publicly apologise to Mr Corbyn by inviting him to an interview on Newsnight, in which the producer of the programme personally apologises for using altered images for political ends.

Please sign this petition to demand that the BBC apologises.


Why is this important?


This is important because the BBC is supposed to be an impartial public broadcaster, not an outlet of the Conservative party.

It's important because the State should not use a public broadcaster to broadcast propaganda.

It's important because this is not just an attack on Mr Corbyn, it's an attack on British democracy.

Please sign this petition to demand that the BBC apologies.



https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/demand-that-the-bbc-publicly-apologise-to-jeremy-corbyn

Thursday, 15 March 2018

Grenfell Tower doors 'resisted fire for half the time expected'

Fire Doors

Grenfell Tower doors 'resisted fire for half the time expected'

Seems 3 fire door samples from Grenvil tower all failed in tests. They were supposed to be 30 minute doors but only lasted 15 min.

Having worked for a partitioning company and a interior refurbishment company I can claim to have  a little bit of knowledge about Fire Doors, although Im no expert.

The main points are


  • Fire doors are notoriously difficult to get through a fire test and vision panels only exacerbate that.
  • Once the fire door has passed the fire test and has a certificate, it then rely's on a few other things.
    • Each fire door has to be manufactured in exactly the same way and using exactly the same materials.
    • Once on site the door has to be installed in excatly the same way that it was when it passed the test.
    • It has to be fitted in a frame which is exactly the same as the test. ie materials and construction.

This rarely happens


Further tests will be carried out on fire doors following the news that front doors to flats in Grenfell Tower burned in just 15 minutes, housing secretary Sajid Javid has said. 
However, he insisted that there is “no evidence that this is a systemic issue”


Due to the nature of how fire doors are tested and installed I believe there is a systemic issue.  There's no evidence because no one has looked for it.



LINKS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-43413989


Tuesday, 13 March 2018

Trump, May, Christopher Steele and Sergei Skripa

Trump was very quick to re-tweet, without checking the facts, a Britain's First tweet. He didn't even know who Britain's First were.

So Trump will comment on anything he wants to even if its fake news, as is normally the case with him, but an attack on British soil .... nope nothing

Lets just run that one again ....A chemical nerve agent is used in an attack in the UK and Trump says absolutely nothing.

Now why would that be?

Lets think about what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot.

  • The UK would immediately condemn the attack.
  • The UK would offer any assistance in tracking down the perpetrator.
  • The UK would offer technical assistance.

Now its well known that Trump has business interests in Russia, so is that the reason?  Well he didn't have to mention Russia just condemn the attack. He didnt.

Trump only does things that suit his own agenda not his own country. This obviously didnt suit his agenda, maybe because it was real rather than fake.

Strangely enough there seem to be reports linking Christopher Steele an ex MI6 officer with Sergei Skripa through a security consultant employed by Christopher Steele, who compiled the Trump dossier.
"Mr Steele went into hiding a year ago when he was revealed as the author of a document detailing salacious allegations about Mr Trump, which was circulating before the election."
"The dossier has sparked a formal investigation in the US into Russian collusion in the US presidential election, to the fury of both presidents Trump and Putin."
So main points would be

  • The particular Nerve Agent used links to Russia.
  • If not Russia then as the PM has said, Russia lost control of some of its WMA.
  • The man who helped delevop the Nerve Agent says it could only come from Russia.
  • The Russians, Trump and possibly the UK gov all have reasons, to use and the wherewithal to have the Nerve Agent.
  • Why would the Russians use something that directly pointed back to them?
  • Why didnt Trump comment?
  • Its almost a certainty that both the US and the UK have access to and antidotes for this nerve agent.
  • Why arnt Sergei Skripa and his daughter dead yet. Was the antidote ready and waiting for them?
We wait and see.


LINKS
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5492371/The-White-House-refuses-MENTION-Russia-Salisbury-comments.html
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/mar/13/tillerson-firmly-backs-uk-over-salisbury-spy-poisoning-as-white-house-refuses-to-blame-russia-politics-live
https://www.itv.com/news/2018-03-13/rex-tillerson-russia-nerve-agent/
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trump-says-us-will-accept-russia-behind-salisbury-poisoning-if-we-agree-with-uk-findings_uk_5aa7d517e4b03c9edfafc9b3
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/07/poisoned-russian-spy-sergei-skripal-close-consultant-linked/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/03/13/boris-johnson-warns-russia-not-underestimate-uk-outrage-fails/
http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/national/16083671.trump-says-it-sounds-like-russia-is-to-blame-for-salisbury-nerve-gas-attack/
http://www.newsweek.com/russia-poison-spy-steele-dossier-836768
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/donald-trump-says-us-will-accept-russia-behind-salisbury-poisoning-if-we-agree-with-uk-findings/ar-BBKamAZ?li=AA59G2
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/03/us-russia-nato-uk/555407/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/07/poisoned-russian-spy-sergei-skripal-close-consultant-linked/ 
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/05/british-ex-spy-behind-lurid-trump-dossier-should-criminally/

Mayhems whodunnit


So if your the head of a country and things arnt going too well its known that the best thing to do is get involved in a war.

Remember Thatcher was heading for an election defeat in 1982. The decision to go to war indisputably saved her. Ive had people argue that, but there is no question without winning the Falklands war Thatcher would have lost the next election. I cover my reasoning on that in two other blogs .

https://garysoapbox.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/was-falkands-war-thatchers-gamble.html
https://garysoapbox.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/mayhems-falklands.html


Back to the present there arn't too many countries that the UK can kick off against and Korea, having mustered the protection it needed, is now off the radar and everyone is going to talk .... for the present.

Is it just me or did Trump go very quiet once it was obvious the man had working nukes and the bully boy tactics wouldn't work any longer?


Brexit is just not going to well for Mayhem and the Tories, prices are rising and in turn inflation. The pound is still low and companies are now starting to get itchy feet. To top all that the problem of the Irish border still remains a so far insurmountable problem and time to be honest is running out.

So I shall play devils advocate .........


  • May is in the shit.
  • She needs to deflect attention away from her and the Tory failings.
  • Cant start a war with anyone.
  • But can start a war of words with Russia.
  • How do we provoke that?
  • I know lets poison an ex MI6 spy with something that can only really be traced back to the Russians.
  • Brilliant that will do it, the argument could go on for months, years even.

Lets remember that they have so far not said that the nerve agent definitely came from Russia.

"The PM said it was "highly likely" Russia was responsible for the Salisbury attack".

So okay why do i think that its a possibility there is some smoke and mirrors going on here, its obviously the Russians Right?

Mrs May said: "Either this was a direct action by the Russian state against our country, or the Russian government lost control of its potentially catastrophically damaging nerve agent and allowed it to get into the hands of others."

Well it certainly looks like it, but then I think well isn't it a bit obvious?

I mean if the Russians were going to attempt to kill someone, why use something that is so obviously traced back to them. There are plenty of ways of killing people and a lot more effective than what was used.

Why are they still alive .... was an antidote readily available?

This guy was out in the open, he didn't have a protection team. There would have been so many opportunities to take him out. Without going to the effort of smuggling in a nerve agent. He was also apparently in regular contact with the Russian embassy.

Now Russians might be a lot of things but im going to gamble that they are not that stupid. So either they attempted to kill with a nerve gas that would lead right back to their door because they wanted everyone to know they did it.

Or they didn't do it.

Oh has anyone noticed a distinct lack of noise from Trump.  No twitter comments.... Nothing as far as I can see.

Strange that isn't it?

I mean hes always been very quick to comment on our NHS and retweet Britain's First posts without checking them.

But apparently an ex MI6 spy being poisoned with nerve gas in the middle of the UK wasn't worthy of a mention.

Strange that isn't it?


As I said at the start just me playing Devils Advocate. The British government doesn't get involved in assassinations.  I know that because a tory MP said so on the radio today :-)




http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43315636
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43377856
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sergei-skripal-regular-contact-russian-embassy-former-kremlin-officer-spy-poison-nerve-agent-a8244926.html

Tuesday, 27 February 2018

Casey Cagle Tweet on NRA




Well there you have it, if anyone needed any evidence.


LINKS
http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/375646-georgia-lt-gov-threatens-delta-unless-it-restores-relationship-with-nra

Dog Poo

TAKE YOUR SHIT HOME OR BIN IT, ITS SIMPLES




Apart from this... it really winds me up that people litter the contyryside with poo bags. Why?? because your too damm selfish to carry it to a bin.

Better to leave it unbagged if you really cant be bothered and if you cant be bothered why have you got a dog in the 1st place?

Dont litter the countryside with poo bags.

Lets put it this way if you knew that if you left your poo bag on the floor it would end up smeared all over your car, would you still leave it on the floor?


LINKS
http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/21/horses-die-because-they-ate-dog-poo-bags-thrown-into-their-field-6589167/
https://troton.com/blogs/articles/item/775-two-horses-die-after-eating-bags-of-dog-poo-dumped-by-owners-horse-welfare
http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/16038474.Horse_owner_s_plea_over_potentially_deadly_dog_waste_bags/
http://www.friendlyandfree.com/dog-poo-bags-killing-horses/
http://www.equisupermarket.co.uk/blog/dog-poo-bags-dangerous-horses/

Monday, 26 February 2018

Trump: I would have run into school during shooting even without a gun

Trump: I would have run into school during shooting even without a gun


Ok I like facts so what he actually said was ....


"You don't know until you test it but I really believe I would have run in there even if I didn't have a weapon"


Yeah yeah Mr President, its easy to stand on a pedestal, big yourself up and say what you might have done. How many security men are standing around you?

Takes a special person to step up when shits flying and I think you'd be the one hiding behind the car.

Take a look at this little incident .....


Lets just say he almost shit himself and there wasn't even a bang .... "I was ready for them" ... Oh dear, yes of course you were.

"Don't worry about the NRA,” Trump told the governors. ”They're on our side.” 
You mean your in their pocket Mr Trump, your bought and paid for.... 



LINKS

Sunday, 10 December 2017

If God were morally perfect



The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect God. If God were all knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. If God were all-powerful, God would be able to do something about all of the evil and suffering. Furthermore, if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it. And yet we find that our world is filled with countless instances of evil and suffering. These facts about evil and suffering seem to conflict with the orthodox theist claim that there exists a perfectly good God. The challenged posed by this apparent conflict has come to be known as the problem of evil.  
(from James Bebee, “The Logical Problem of Evil”)

(1) If God existed, then He would be all-knowing, all-powerful, and morally perfect.
(2) If God was all-knowing, then He would be aware of all evil.
(3) If God was all-powerful, then He would be able to prevent all evil.
(4) If God was morally perfect, then He would be motivated to prevent all evil that He is aware of and able to.
(5) If God was aware of all evil, and was able to prevent all evil, and was motivated to prevent all evil that He is aware of and is able to, then there would be no evil.
(6) There is evil.


Difficult to fault the logic ....



LINKS
http://myweb.facstaff.wwu.edu/wasserr/114/Arguments.pdf

Thursday, 23 November 2017

Tories policies have failed


The Tories policies have failed, the evidence is all around us. The have failed on every economic forcast and this isnt just because of the Finacial crash because pretty much every EU country is doing better. If that isnt an indication of failure then I dont know what is.



Weak and Wobbly the Conservatives of Chaos......
"UK is the worst-performing advanced economy in the world, official figures confirm"

"The UK is on course for its longest fall in living standards since records began more than 60 years ago, with real disposable incomes now set to fall for 19 successive quarters."

"We are in danger of losing not just one but getting on for two decades of earnings growth,"

"The latest official figures showed workers' earnings, excluding bonuses, rose 2.2% in the three months to September compared with a year ago."
"But they fell 0.5% in real terms when accounting for inflation, marking seven months of negative pay growth, according to the Office for National Statistics."

"GDP grew at just 0.2 per cent during the first three months of this year – slower than all other G7 and European countries, the Office for National Statistics reported"

 "The UK economy, which had held up better than expected in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote, is now lagging behind all of the other countries in the G7 group of advanced nations and all other European countries."



LINKS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42096806
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/uk-economy-world-worst-performing-advanced-countries-state-g7-european-union-a7817046.html 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_governments

Thursday, 16 November 2017

The EU Cabbage - Myth



Did a government memo regulating the sale of cabbages use 26,911 words? 

Very basically ..... 

No its bollox


[Collected via e-mail, April 2012]
For anybody who doesn?t fully understand the Euro situation,
it is explained very simply in the picture below……..
THIS IS BRILLIANT – and loopholes Europe in a “few” words
Pythagoras’ theorem – 24 words.
Lord’s Prayer – 66 words.
Archimedes’ Principle – 67 words.
10 Commandments – 179 words.
Gettysburg address – 286 words.
US Declaration of Independence – 1,300 words.
US Constitution with all 27 Amendments – 7,818 words.
EU regulations on the sale of a cabbage – 26,911 words

Previous versions
[Collected via e-mail, 2000]
Pythagorean theorem: 24 words
The Lord’s Prayer: 66 words
Archimedes’ Principle: 67 words
The Ten Commandments: 179 words
The Gettysburg Address: 286 words
The Declaration of Independence: 1,300 words
The US government regulations on the sale of cabbage: 26,911 words

  • Various versions have been around for at least 50 years
  • The EU did have a document relating to cabbages which was 2000 words long.
  • The EU no longer has a document relating to cabbages
  
In 2006, Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 addressed the size of cabbages, and how they should be labelled, in just under 2,000 words. In 2009, however, these regulations, along with some other rules on the sale of fruit and vegetables, were repealed.
 For those who are unsure how big a 2000 word document is. Its aproximately 5 pages of A4 and the actual document is here.

Interestinly the actual document is actually 5 1/2 pages and 1,996 long in english

FR - 4 Pages 775 words
EL - 7 pages 781 words
ET - 3 Pages 480 words
DE - 8 Pages 1793 words





LINKS
https://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35962999
https://www.indy100.com/article/dont-believe-anything-a-eurosceptic-tells-you-about-cabbage--bJHxXSSIebZ
http://www.skeptical-science.com/politics/cabbages-vs/