Sunday, 10 December 2017

If God were morally perfect



The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect God. If God were all knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. If God were all-powerful, God would be able to do something about all of the evil and suffering. Furthermore, if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it. And yet we find that our world is filled with countless instances of evil and suffering. These facts about evil and suffering seem to conflict with the orthodox theist claim that there exists a perfectly good God. The challenged posed by this apparent conflict has come to be known as the problem of evil.  
(from James Bebee, “The Logical Problem of Evil”)

(1) If God existed, then He would be all-knowing, all-powerful, and morally perfect.
(2) If God was all-knowing, then He would be aware of all evil.
(3) If God was all-powerful, then He would be able to prevent all evil.
(4) If God was morally perfect, then He would be motivated to prevent all evil that He is aware of and able to.
(5) If God was aware of all evil, and was able to prevent all evil, and was motivated to prevent all evil that He is aware of and is able to, then there would be no evil.
(6) There is evil.


Difficult to fault the logic ....



LINKS
http://myweb.facstaff.wwu.edu/wasserr/114/Arguments.pdf

Thursday, 23 November 2017

Tories policies have failed


The Tories policies have failed, the evidence is all around us. The have failed on every economic forcast and this isnt just because of the Finacial crash because pretty much every EU country is doing better. If that isnt an indication of failure then I dont know what is.



Weak and Wobbly the Conservatives of Chaos......
"UK is the worst-performing advanced economy in the world, official figures confirm"

"The UK is on course for its longest fall in living standards since records began more than 60 years ago, with real disposable incomes now set to fall for 19 successive quarters."

"We are in danger of losing not just one but getting on for two decades of earnings growth,"

"The latest official figures showed workers' earnings, excluding bonuses, rose 2.2% in the three months to September compared with a year ago."
"But they fell 0.5% in real terms when accounting for inflation, marking seven months of negative pay growth, according to the Office for National Statistics."

"GDP grew at just 0.2 per cent during the first three months of this year – slower than all other G7 and European countries, the Office for National Statistics reported"

 "The UK economy, which had held up better than expected in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote, is now lagging behind all of the other countries in the G7 group of advanced nations and all other European countries."



LINKS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42096806
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/uk-economy-world-worst-performing-advanced-countries-state-g7-european-union-a7817046.html 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_governments

Thursday, 16 November 2017

The EU Cabbage - Myth



Did a government memo regulating the sale of cabbages use 26,911 words? 

Very basically ..... 

No its bollox


[Collected via e-mail, April 2012]
For anybody who doesn?t fully understand the Euro situation,
it is explained very simply in the picture below……..
THIS IS BRILLIANT – and loopholes Europe in a “few” words
Pythagoras’ theorem – 24 words.
Lord’s Prayer – 66 words.
Archimedes’ Principle – 67 words.
10 Commandments – 179 words.
Gettysburg address – 286 words.
US Declaration of Independence – 1,300 words.
US Constitution with all 27 Amendments – 7,818 words.
EU regulations on the sale of a cabbage – 26,911 words

Previous versions
[Collected via e-mail, 2000]
Pythagorean theorem: 24 words
The Lord’s Prayer: 66 words
Archimedes’ Principle: 67 words
The Ten Commandments: 179 words
The Gettysburg Address: 286 words
The Declaration of Independence: 1,300 words
The US government regulations on the sale of cabbage: 26,911 words

  • Various versions have been around for at least 50 years
  • The EU did have a document relating to cabbages which was 2000 words long.
  • The EU no longer has a document relating to cabbages
  
In 2006, Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 addressed the size of cabbages, and how they should be labelled, in just under 2,000 words. In 2009, however, these regulations, along with some other rules on the sale of fruit and vegetables, were repealed.
 For those who are unsure how big a 2000 word document is. Its aproximately 5 pages of A4 and the actual document is here.

Interestinly the actual document is actually 5 1/2 pages and 1,996 long in english

FR - 4 Pages 775 words
EL - 7 pages 781 words
ET - 3 Pages 480 words
DE - 8 Pages 1793 words





LINKS
https://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35962999
https://www.indy100.com/article/dont-believe-anything-a-eurosceptic-tells-you-about-cabbage--bJHxXSSIebZ
http://www.skeptical-science.com/politics/cabbages-vs/

Monday, 9 October 2017

Mayhems Falklands


In 1982 Thatcher was heading for an election defeat. The decision to go to war indisputably saved her, it was a gamble that paved the way for the destruction of the unions and Thatcherism.

But was it a gamble or a well executed plan to avoid defeat in the 1983 election. Thatcher would have had to turn around some negatives not only in her own party, the Tories were already sharpening the knives and she had little support in her own party. She was also well behind in the polls defeat was almost inevitable.

There are several points that lead me to believe that Thatcher constructed the ability of the Argentines to invade by purposely missing obvious signals. (I've already covered this in another post linked here)

The main points were
  1. The British ignored things that the Argentinian's were saying in the UN or hints that they were making about military action.
  2. John Nott withdrew the Endeavor which was the support ship for the Falklands.
  3. The British government brought in the British nationality act of 1981 which replaced the full British citizenship of Falkland islanders with the more limited version.
  4. Intelligence had been received that the Argentinian's might attempt something and Thatcher was advised to dispatch a small military force, but refused to do so.

Though spring brought some relief to the battered economy, Thatcher appeared a weak, broken leader with little support even within her party. What was later called Thatcherism was still a dream, with only top-rate tax cuts in place. The ruling obsession was reducing double-digit inflation and cutting public spending. Nothing else seemed to concern the government.
In the frontline for cuts were defence and foreign affairs. John Nott's defence review would pull back the surface fleet to home waters. Hong Kong was to be handed over to the Chinese and a tiny colony of islands in the south Atlantic was being negotiated for "sale and leaseback" to neighbouring Argentina by Thatcher's trusted junior foreign minister, Nicholas Ridley. The one naval vessel in its vicinity, HMS Endurance, was to be withdrawn.
To Argentina's military junta, the British government was patently eager to dispose of the Falklands. Thus when Ridley's initiative was mauled in the Commons and talks stalled, the invitation to the Argentinian junta to imitate India's seizure of Goa in 1961 was irresistible. The invasion was named Operation Goa. Even with tension mounting, Thatcher turned a deaf ear to pleas from the Foreign Office to reinforce the islands and deploy ships to the area. The foreign secretary, Lord Carrington, felt his relations with Thatcher were too delicate to press the matter.
The gamble or plan paid off and the rest is history

So lets move onto Theresa May

Pretty similar, having a car crash year. Bad decisions regarding elections, losing support within her own party. Down in the polls with Labour taking a lead in recent polls.  Probably being set up to take the Brexit flack as she's unlikely to lead the Tories into the next election on current standing.

So maybe North Korea will become Mays Falklands ...... could 1982 be rewritten with 2018? Time will tell.
The prime minister's decision to go to war in 1982, with her government on the brink of collapse, changed everything.


The latest headlines

Britain 'draws up battle plan for war with North Korea'
Britain makes battle plans for war with North Korea: Top brass could send new aircraft carrier BEFORE it's had flight trials as Trump says 'only one thing will work' after 25 years of failed talks
UK draws up North Korea BATTLE PLAN amid fear WW3 starts TODAY

LINKs

Thursday, 5 October 2017

Theresa May ~ AKA Mayhem, Maybe, Maybenot

Theresa May ~ AKA Mayhem, Maybe, Maybenot

 We can now add dead May walking and May Fall



Theresa May has now made more bad decisions than any normal Prime Minister would be allowed to get away with. The Tories are not known for holding onto deadwood just look at what happened to Thatcher.

They know that Brexit is a poisoned chalice with the country split down the middle, 50% of the people are pretty much guaranteed to be unhappy with what is negotiated.

So Theresa May is the fall guy. They will keep her on to take the flack from whatever fallout there is from Brexit and then she'll be booted like Thatcher was and a new boy/person will take charge.

Time will tell.


What did Khan actually say about Manchester bombing



Sadiq Khan's statement in full

"London stands united with the great city of Manchester today after this barbaric and sickening attack. This was a cowardly act of terrorism that targeted a concert attended by thousands of children and young people.

"My heart goes out to the victims, their families and everybody affected. Once again we have seen the heroism of our brave emergency services. They have our full support and are in all our thoughts today.

"I am in constant contact with the Metropolitan Police, who are reviewing security arrangements in London. Londoners will see more police on our streets today.

"Manchester and the rest of Britain will never be cowed by terrorism. Those who want to destroy our way of life and divide us will never succeed."




LINKS
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2017/may/24/manchester-arena-bombing-terror-attack-victims-threat-critical-ariana-grande-concert-live-news

Thursday, 28 September 2017

Trump has little qualification to run a country



 
 
Apart from being a bull shitter Trump has little qualification to run a country.

2/3rds of his business ventures have been failures and if he didn’t start with access to a massive fortune and his father’s business contacts he would have failed big time years and years ago. Any normal person would have been out on the street as soon as they defaulted on a bank.

Transpose his business failures to that of his decisions as president and that would mean we can expect 2/3rds of decisions to be bad. Pretty much what we are seeing now, evidence is proof.
Main qualifications ...Bankruptcies (his own companies), defaults, deceptions, indifference to investors (take that as the voting public now)

He is also pretty good at self-deception, and plain old deception. Trump is willing to claim success even when it is not there. Again we have seen evidence of this which is difficult to refute.

With that amount of arrogance, propensity to failure and willingness to open his gob without thinking, Trump is a danger to the whole world.

LINKS

Sunday, 17 September 2017

What do you call a pay rise that isnt




Lets spell this out simply ...

Since 2010 inflation has averaged 2.7%, according to the Bank of England.

So anyone who hasn't had a pay rise for 7 years has basically had a pay reduction.

7 years x 2.7% = 18.9%

Anyone who hasn't had a pay rise for 7 years has in effect had a pay cut of 18.9% on average.


Whilst any pay increase is not to be sniffed at its hardly a flag waving event when people are still on a pay cut.  Even if people achieve a pay increase of 4% they will still be sitting on a pay decrease of 14.9% over 7 years.

A proper pay rise would be 19% because even tho the actual rise is only 0.1% it would actually be a rise.

I'm not even sure what you can call a pay rise that isn't a rise.





















LINKS
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/education/Pages/resources/inflationtools/calculator/default.aspx

Thursday, 20 July 2017

12 billion on foreign aid v 94 billion in tax concessions

12 billion on foreign aid against 94 billion a year in tax concessions to big corporations




Now whilst I don't necessarily agree with sending money abroad when we have problems with our own poor and homeless. The situation of our poorest people is one that has quite clearly been made worse by the Tories.  I've no problem with helping people,  I do have a problem with 94 billion being given away to rich corporations though.

Even if you don't agree with that statement you have to agree that giving away 94 billion in tax concessions that were neither asked for or required is...OK lets be nice .... Generous.

For a Country that's struggling to get control of a debt of now 1.7 trillion, yes the Tories have increased the Countries debt by over 800 billion in 7 years.

Its Generous in the extreme!

So if they hadn't given yours and mine money away we could have paid 94 billion off the UK's debt each year.  Or we could have paid 50 billion off the debt and 44 billion into the NHS. We could have paid 94 billion into projects that were going to generate money for the UK rather than foreign countries.

So as you are good at sharing memes complaining about foreign aid, why not share one about the 94 billion tax concessions handed out.

By the way the foreign aid budget is 11% of  the 94 Billion a year that big Corporations get handed each year courtesy of Osbourne.

Fight for the big money!





LINKS
https://fullfact.org/economy/uk-spending-foreign-aid/
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/07/corporate-welfare-a-93bn-handshake
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/uk-foreign-aid-budget_uk_57d953afe4b00f741735477f

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Chairman May telling more lies about Cladding




The 1984 Documentary That Predicted Grenfell Tower

At PMQs Today, Jeremy Corbyn launched an attack on the Tory government’s agenda of cuts to local authorities, and the effect they had on the Grenfell disaster, saying:
"When you cut local authority budgets by 40% we all pay a price in safety.
Fewer inspectors, fewer building control inspectors, fewer planning inspectors. We all pay a price.
And Mr Speaker, those cuts to the fire service have meant that there are 11,000 fewer firefighters. The public sector pay cap is hitting recruitment and retention right across the public sector. What the tragedy of Grenfell Tower has exposed is the disastrous effect of austerity.
This disregard for working-class communities, the terrible consequences of deregulation and cutting corners, I urge the prime minister to come up with the resources needed to test and remove cladding, retrofit sprinklers, properly fund the fire service and the police so that all our communities can truly feel safe in their own homes.
This disaster must be a wake-up call."
Chairman May responded by claiming that the cladding of the tower blocks began under Tony Blairs New Labour government.


"The cladding of tower blocks did not start under this government, it did not start under the previous government. The cladding of tower blocks began under the Blair government."

The video above however, proves that the cladding of Tower Blocks started in 1984 and who was in power in 1984 ...... Margret Thatcher 1979 - 1989.

CONCLUSION
Chairman May lied on this point,  the cladding of Tower Blocks started in 1984 and Margret Thatcher 1979 - 1989 was in power.


LINKS
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/grenfell-tower-fire-1984-documentary-predict-disaster-north-kensington-a7811616.html
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01b_1498515562
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=153834
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/625609/Grenfell-Tower-fire-west-London-inferno-predicted-television-documentary-30-years-ago
https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/home/over-half-of-council-towers-pose-a-fire-risk/5205197.article
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/28/lakanal-house-fire-deaths-prevented
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mUhdsCUjJeQC&pg=PA5&lpg=PA5&dq=where+was+cladding+on+tower+blocks+1st+used&source=bl&ots=jcw1GTfXAP&sig=y3sJa2KqLznKBEtXgpVDJV4ejM4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-zce_v-HUAhXkCcAKHUOBAAw4RhDoAQg1MAM#v=onepage&q=where%20was%20cladding%20on%20tower%20blocks%201st%20used&f=false

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

In light of the recent Grenfell Tower fire

Its always the way, horse, stable, bolted ..... my company and I'm sure others across the UK are sending out messages to staff starting something like this....
Dear Colleagues

"In light of the recent Grenfell Tower fire in London we are carrying out a review of Fire Safety to identify any areas we could improve on"

Here's a start

1hr Fire Door ... I don't think so

I was Manager at a Partitioning company back in my distant past and involved in designing a partitioning system including fire tests on various components including doors, so have some knowledge in the area of fire and fire tests.

Fire safety is a can of worms and just because a door, for instance, is supplied with a fire rating certificate, doesn’t mean it has a fire rating if its installed incorrectly. Doors and leafs are particularly difficult to get through a fire test and get a certificate. Adding vision panels only exacerbates the problems. Also every bit of door furniture cuts into the integrity of the fire stopping abilities of the door and has to be put back.

I had a quick look at one door in our building which on a stair well should be 1hr fire rated. I found three initial faults (there may be more I didn’t look that hard).

Faults as noted on the picture above
  1. Intumescent strip continuity has been broken at top of door which is worst point.
  2. Flush bolts should be bedded in intumescent paste.
  3. Hinges should be fitted with intumescent strip under both blades.
I wouldn’t bet on the door above lasting longer than 15mins before integrity failed at top of door and fire crossed over to other side.

The problem is this isn’t unusual and these type of faults can be found all over the UK. Installers only get asked to provide a fire certificate to cover the type of door installed, not the installation and I have rarely seen flush bolts or hinges fitted on site with intumescent paste or strip. Also how long the installation will last in a fire depends on the skill and attention of the person that fitted it.

At a previous place of work, the IT Department was situated at the end of a corridor with access in and out, down this same corridor. The wall on the corridor side should have been 1hr fire rated construction. Unfortunately over the years someone had fitted a glass sliding hatch into the wall. That means the integrity of the wall has been broken and a hatchway of this type would last a maximum of approximately10 Min's before fire crossed over. I pointed this out several times until eventually they got a fire officer down to look at it. He said it was fine. Go figure.

The problem is it takes something like Grenfell before people start questioning. History shows its only noises in most cases not much actual action will happen.

In the case of blocks of flats the profile has been raised to high on the back of many unnecessary deaths and changes are being made. But there will still be corners cut.

Time will tell as it has a habit of biting back.



Links
http://www.firesafe.org.uk/fire-doors/
http://www.firesafe.org.uk/fire-doors/ 

Monday, 19 June 2017

The Lies about Grenfell Exposed

The Comment

For all protesters blaming Theresa May. And for all Labour / Jeremy Corbyn supporters note the following facts.

Grenfell Tower built by a Labour Council, under a Labour Government ~ "Sorry Rubbish"

Sadiq Khan was the Housing Minister in 2008. As Mayor he produced a report saying the Fire Services DID NOT need further funding. ~ "Sorry Rubbish"

Emma Coad newly elected MP was on the board of the tenant management group who are now accused of not listening to the tenants. ~ "This has some semblence of truth"

The cladding (banned in the USA) was chosen by Ed Miliband to meet EU climate change legislation. ~ "Sorry Rubbish"

Time to look inward and stop shifting the blame elsewhere for political gain.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So lets have a look at this because I like facts, when they are factual and not just being banded around for some political agenda.

Alleged fact 1

Grenfell Tower built by a Labour Council, under a Labour Government 

Fact
It was Designed in 1967, Council approved construction in 1970, Build Started in 1972 completed in 1974.
It was designed during Harold Wilson's (Labour) reign by Clifford Wearden and Associates
Construction was approved in 1970 when Edward Heath (Conservative) was in power.
The build was started in 1972 when Edward Health (Conservative) was in power.
Build was completed in 1974 when Harold Wilson (Labour) came back into power.

Was Grenfell Tower built by a Labour Council?  Since 1964 the Kensington and Chelsea council has been controlled by the Conservative party.

Was Grenfell tower built under a Labour Government? The majority of the construction if not all of it was during a Conservative Government.

CONCLUSION = MISINFORMATION

Alleged fact 2

Sadiq Khan was the Housing Minister in 2008. 
FACT: He wasn't the housing minister in 2008. That was Caroline Flint and then Margaret Beckett.

As Mayor he produced a report saying the Fire Services DID NOT need further funding. 
FACT: Im unable to find any documents or report where he said this.

CONCLUSION = SUSPECTED MISINFORMATION

Alleged fact 3

Emma Coad newly elected MP was on the board of the tenant management group who are now accused of not listening to the tenants.  
FACT: She was on the board of the Housing and Property Scrutiny Committee between 23/05/2013 - 11/06/2014

CONCLUSION = FACTUAL 


Alleged fact 4

The cladding (banned in the USA) was chosen by Ed Miliband to meet EU climate change legislation.
FACT: I can only find this comment from the chancellor Phillip Hammond “My understanding is the cladding in question, this flammable cladding which is banned in Europe and the US, is also banned here.  I can find no evidence of it being chosen by Ed Milliband.

CONCLUSION = SUSPECTED MISINFORMATION



Links

Tuesday, 13 June 2017

Possibly the best Tweet ever


Dear Theresa, it's not the number of MPs that counts it's how you use them. You have to do more with less that's all 😂👏👍




Nothing more needs to be said really.